Jump to content

Fong's Lightsphere with flash bracket or without?


Recommended Posts

OK I've read that a flash bracket is not needed when using the

Lightsphere II but what I can not determine is should I avoid using

the bracket?

 

I admit I'm adicted to my flash bracket. It's got a darn convenient

handle and helps me hold the camera steady.

 

I guess if I wan't so cheap and lazy I'd pay the $48 and test it but

thought I'd ask here first. Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In certain situations, the LS still throws the subject's shadow on to the back wall. Most of the time, the shadow is reduced enough not to attract unwanted distraction in the image. If you look for it, it's there.

I like my Newton bracket and keep it on the camera despite having the LS.

 

Alan

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The LS II when shooting it direct in certain situations that need it, gives subjects the red

eye. Using the bracket obviously does not. You always have to bounce the LS to avoid

this, however it's impossible to always bounce it when you're out doors say at the beach

shooting a group shot where flash is needed. When I have the LS pointing up with the

dome on it, it doesn't work well, so I have to do direct flash, and sometimes you get red

eye.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ask yourself if you're ever going to be in a situation where you have to use direct flash and shoot vertical, like outside where you need as much flash power as you can get. You could use the LS most of the time, but for those few instances, will you care if the flash is not oriented above the lens axis? If the answer is yes, then continue with the bracket. If the answer is no, then go without. On a bracket, the only thing about the LS is that it becomes "tall", and this could be a problem with hot spots with wide angles or with low ceilings.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have used my lightsphere with my bracket for this reason. The lightsphere is not very good at long distances. So, I would mount the lightsphere on with the bracket, ready to take the lightsphere off at a moments notice to shoot those longer distances. But I have to admit, I like it less bulky without the bracket.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

David, I'm not too good at judging distances. But, I don't like to shoot with my light sphere more than say 15 feet? (I know. Don't chew me out. As a photographer I shoud KNOW my distances.) I feel my images are under exposed if I am further than that. There are a lot of variables in this though. The ceeling hight makes a big difference. Also, what ISO and F stop make a difference. I suppose that with a higher ISO and wider f stop, you could shoot at a longer distance. I typically like to shoot at 400 ISO and F4-4.8 with a shutter speed at about 1/90. I have tried higher ISO and wider f stops, but then I think it has a tendancy to overexpose when shooting closer. You are really ok up to 25 feet? What are your settings? I am going to a Gary Fong seminar Feb 9 in Chicago. I hope to pick up some good tips there. I also just bought a second digital camera. Before my backup was film, and I didn't want to use it unless I had to. Now, with two digital, I load one with a bracket and flash, and one with a lightsphee, flash, and no bracket. So, I am covered either way.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Larry, I think the pro was trying to say that when you are doing classic portraiture/glamour portraits that are full length or 3/4 views, (also tends to be true for the altar/formal shots) then you want to get the lens at about waist high to give you a nice perspective (consider all the older classic shots using a TLR or Hasselblad with the waist-viewer)But, in this case you are using studio lighting which is raised to about a 45 degree angle...when your lighting with a flash, this tends to limit the heigth you can obtain. With a bracket, it will always be a compromise with flash height -vs- lens height. (I also still have an old Siegelite flash bracket that is adjustable and will give me an extra 12-20 inches of heigth). When doing the head & shoulder shots and most of the candids, I think a higher vantage point will generally help...which explains the milk crate that I sometimes stand on at the backdrop or why I lift the camera up above my head shooting down at the dancefloor. Most of the time I wish I had the heighth....just rememeber not to get stuck up there :-)<div>00EoBx-27434584.jpg.d272c324e26910c8b3cb7df000ec0bec.jpg</div>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually I think the rule of thumb as to camera height is that the camera should be at or close to waist level if shooting a full length shot. 3/4, at about torso/chest level, 1/2 length, at chest level, head and shoulders at eye level unless you are deliberately playing with perspective.

 

In my opinion, it's much better to be too tall than too short, like I am. I carry a small stepladder around with me a lot, which is very important when I'm using my Hasselblad (45 degree prism) and my subjects are tall. If you're tall, you can always bend down a little. Larry, just as an example, I've been on cruise boat weddings where the ceilings were about 7 feet tall. You wouldn't have been able to use a bracket with the LS then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay good discussion/lessons here.

 

The center of lens to center of (550EX) flash distance on my lil'rebel XT is 6-1/2".

 

If I raise the camera to eye level and am shooting downward most of the time will this lessen the need for a bracket? (now I am seeing why the sphere is so popular because it is a like a grenade of light)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"If I raise the camera to eye level and am shooting downward most of the time will this lessen the need for a bracket?"

 

No. The distance that matters is the one between the camera lens and the flash. The relationship between camera height and subject affects the perspective of the image (in this case, the pleasing rendition of a human), regardless of lighting or shadows. The relationship between camera lens and flash affects the placement of shadows behind the subject, among other things. What are you trying to determine? Whether you need a bracket or not, given how tall you are? If so, your height is not a factor.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nadine, I think you've managed to agree with me in disagreeable way...what is waist level -vs- torso level will be different for someone who is 5'5" as opposed to 6'2". The point of the full length or 3/4 length portrait is to drop the lens down to waist level as opposed to shooting it at eye level, especially if you are 6"5" tall. But all of this factors in studio lights that are likely 7-9 feet tall. If your light is flash on a camera or on a bracket then you are typically better off gaining height.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

David--when I talk about waist level, chest level, etc., I mean the subject's waist, chest, etc, not the photographer's. Sorry, didn't make that clear. I'm also referring to these points in reference to the "ideal" perspective of the human figure--to avoid distortion. You'll notice that each point is about halfway between the bottom and top parts of the subject.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...