andy clarke Posted September 2, 2009 Share Posted September 2, 2009 <p>Hey, <br> Im new to rangefinders, just got my first one today, A Canonet GIII QL17.</p> <p>I was wondering, the focusing area in the middle; is it supposed to have defined edges? mine has a clear focusing area but the edges fade away into clear.</p> <p>Is this normal? its still very usuable but i was just wondering as i have used a Mamiya6 in the past and its focusing area was very noticable.</p> <p>Thanks<br> Andy</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_shriver Posted September 2, 2009 Share Posted September 2, 2009 <p>At least in 35mm, only the Leica M and Zeiss Ikon "ZM" cameras have sharp edges on the secondary focusing image in the rangefinder. All other rangefinder cameras use a simpler system, and have a "fuzzy edged" secondary image. The difference in complexity of the Leica/Zeiss rangefinder is considerable.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winfried_buechsenschuetz1 Posted September 3, 2009 Share Posted September 3, 2009 <p>The old Werra rangefinder cameras made in GDR (there are also rangefinder-less Werra versions) also have a quite sophisticated rangefinder system which projects a rangefinder field with sharp edges.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bjscharp Posted September 3, 2009 Share Posted September 3, 2009 The advantage of a sharp edge is that the rangefinder spot can also be used as a split-image focussing aid, like a split-image prism in an SLR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winfried_buechsenschuetz1 Posted September 4, 2009 Share Posted September 4, 2009 <p>Actually the Werra rangefinders rather had a split-image rangefinder, you had to match the edges of the object in the rangefinder spot with those on the upper and lower edge of the rangefinder spot.<br> There were also some cameras with a "semi split image" rangefinder, like the Certo Super-Dollina. The rangefinder "spot" rather was the lower half of the image but there was a small area where both images were superimposed, so you could use it split-image-like or superimposed-image like.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now