kevin_beretta Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 I found an outfit in Taiwan that supplies split screens for the D850. Not much else seems to come up in searches and B&H comes up dry too. There seem to be a lot of focusing screens on B&H for other cameras though ... is there a compatibility? I am debating shooting more manual focus so likely need something more old school to help me focus. Rear screen works but is not conducive to what I want to do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike_halliwell Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 When I want to try MF for such things, I do use the back screen, but with one of those 3x Loupe Attachments. They essentially make the back LCD into an EVF. Zooming in for critical focusing is easy. I use mine with my D850 and AF-dead 600mm f4 AF-S for long range stuff. It's OK for birdies sitting on branches but not really for anything moving much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Ingold Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 You will find that a split-prism screen is not very effective for manual focusing. You need to find a suitable contrasting edge in the subject, and the sensitivity is relatively small compared to a rangefinder camera (e.g., Leica M). One or both halves of the split screen goes dark at f/5.6 or smaller. The D850 has a focus indicator in the margins of the viewfinder, which tells you if the subject is in focus, or which direction to turn. It is based on which focusing bracket is selected in the viewfinder, so you can place it off center when needed. Live view is very effective for manual focusing, with several problems. It is very hard to see the rear screen in daylight, and you can't use it close to your eye without assistance. Most important is that you have to raise the mirror, which is not conducive to spontaneous photography. A loupe solves the first two issues, shielding the screen from extraneous light, and moving your eye close to the camera. Combined with the "magnify" focusing mode, manual focusing is very precise. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShunCheung Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 I find live view an effective way to focus manually. Another concern is that such focusing screen may interfere with metering, which is inside the prism. But this is digital: you can always check an image and reshoot with adjustment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeBu Lamar Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 Trade the D850 for the Z7. If I like split screen I much rather use a mirrorless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mary Doo Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 I found an outfit in Taiwan that supplies split screens for the D850. Not much else seems to come up in searches and B&H comes up dry too. There seem to be a lot of focusing screens on B&H for other cameras though ... is there a compatibility? I am debating shooting more manual focus so likely need something more old school to help me focus. Rear screen works but is not conducive to what I want to do. Split screen is a thing of distant past. D850 has a "focus peaking" feature for manual focus. See instruction here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike_halliwell Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 D850 has a "focus peaking" feature for manual focu Which only works on the D850's back screen, which the OP doesn't want to use....:( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BeBu Lamar Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 Which only works on the D850's back screen, which the OP doesn't want to use....:( And that is why I told him to switch to the Z7 instead. I like to manual focus my SLR with only the plain ground glass. I hate the split screen as it turns my SLR into a rangefinder. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2Oceans Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 Kevin, Nikon and Beattie made nice focusing screens, one of the the last being a Nikon E (grid) screen for the D3s. I still own that proud camera. Everything since that time has been done digitally. I have not taken the focus screen out of my DSLRs since that time. Now I typically use live view and zoom in to where I want critical manual focus. Focus peaking on the D850 provides additional assistance by highlighting areas that are in focus. I would imagine that the digital method is more accurate and precise down to the pixel than relying on the human eye. Give it a try. Also I was never into gadgets but I love my Hoodman loop. Its really helps doing anything critical with the back screen of my camera and also helps when reviewing in bright light. Good hunting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Ingold Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 If you like high resolution with manual focusing, then switching to a Z7 (or other MILC) makes good sense. You have the advantage of 100% live view with effective focusing aids, or auto focus if it suits you. All of this comes in a package with a footprint comparable to a Leica M. Since my first MILC, I've used prime and manual lenses more often than zooms. I've even chased grandchildren with manual lenses, but it's a whole lot easier with auto focus. For precise, selective focus, it's hard to beat an MILC and manual lens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rodeo_joe1 Posted November 20, 2019 Share Posted November 20, 2019 Hasn't this been discussed and beaten to death quite recently already? I distinctly remember a thread where the OP bought a black circle split image screen, only to discover it completely messed up the camera's exposure metering. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Ingold Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 Any question worth asking is worth a considered response. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevin_beretta Posted November 21, 2019 Author Share Posted November 21, 2019 [uSER=2403817]@rodeo_joe|1[/uSER] I don't think that was me ... I've never tinkered with split screen. @BeBu Lamar Switching systems is not an option ... I have a small fortune in good glass I don't want to recycle. @2Oceans I'll take a look at a Hoodman loop. Thanks all for your feedback, we can let this one go :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike_halliwell Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 I'll take a look at a Hoodman loop Have a good look at some of the MUCH cheaper clones, here in the UK they are 3X as expensive as some of the very good alternatives. Ideally find a 'real' camera store so you actually look through them. Some of the cheap ones have poor optics and a very poor method of attachment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rodeo_joe1 Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 The thread that I recalled is here. If you scroll down to posting #10 you'll see that PapaTango, the OP, reaches a very unfavourable conclusion on the usefulness of his substitute screen. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
2Oceans Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 Kevin, I agree with Mike. Take a look at some of the less expensive view finder loupes. I bought my Hoodman 8 years ago before checking out the alternatives and I would say that there is nothing special about Hoodman's build quality. My German made loupes for film are much nicer quality and the 4X Rodenstock that was my primary film loupe cost less than the Hoodman. Amazon carries affordable view finder loupes that have good ratings. By-the-way Rodeo, I really like the Ansel Adams look of your new photograph. The first day it came on it switch back and forth with the old photo. I thought I was hallucinating. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Ingold Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 The Hoodman loupe does not magnify. The image is 1:1, but allows you to hold the camera at eye level. I can strap it in place with a couple of large rubber bands, or a bungi cord like strap sold by Hoodman. That's not possible with a photo loupe. Besides, you need a photo loupe for MF film, at least 3" in diameter. It's much easier to use the rear screen for video than the viewfinder, especially if you attach a Hoodman. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rodeo_joe1 Posted November 21, 2019 Share Posted November 21, 2019 (edited) I haven't tried it on a DSLR, but somewhere I have a Nikon optical magnifier that screws directly to the camera eyepiece. I believe it gives a 6x magnification, but only allows viewing of the central 1/4 to 1/3rd of the screen. It allowed very precise focussing with an uncluttered type B screen, which was my preferred screen back in the manual-focus and film era. The magnifier flips up when not needed BTW and, come to think of it, probably wouldn't clear the larger prism of a DSLR. I recently had my hands on a 3rd party RA finder attachment that offered a 3x mag at the touch of a lever. The image was surprisingly clear, and I would have bought it if the dioptre adjustment suited my unaided eyesight. Unfortunately it just fell a bit short, but for someone with better eyesight than mine I'd seriously consider getting one. (The eye relief wearing spectacles just wasn't long enough to permit a full and easy view of the screen either - pooh!) Edited November 21, 2019 by rodeo_joe|1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevin_beretta Posted November 24, 2019 Author Share Posted November 24, 2019 I haven't tried it on a DSLR, but somewhere I have a Nikon optical magnifier that screws directly to the camera eyepiece. I believe it gives a 6x magnification, but only allows viewing of the central 1/4 to 1/3rd of the screen. It allowed very precise focussing with an uncluttered type B screen, which was my preferred screen back in the manual-focus and film era. The magnifier flips up when not needed BTW and, come to think of it, probably wouldn't clear the larger prism of a DSLR. I recently had my hands on a 3rd party RA finder attachment that offered a 3x mag at the touch of a lever. The image was surprisingly clear, and I would have bought it if the dioptre adjustment suited my unaided eyesight. Unfortunately it just fell a bit short, but for someone with better eyesight than mine I'd seriously consider getting one. (The eye relief wearing spectacles just wasn't long enough to permit a full and easy view of the screen either - pooh!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevin_beretta Posted November 24, 2019 Author Share Posted November 24, 2019 I've had a bit of time to play with the manual lens I borrowed. I had no problem whatsoever to get it tack sharp when I was working with it, without using live view or any other aids. It's an F2 50 AI lens, 20+ years old. I compared it to my 1.4 G 50 mm AFS and when focusing closely, the manual lens was sharper. From 4 feet onward it was the same. The big difference was that the new lens rendered color a lot better and had less vignetting. But the purpose of the exercise was met. Sometime before the end of March next year I am going to add a 1.4 50 mm Zeiss to the collection. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike_halliwell Posted November 24, 2019 Share Posted November 24, 2019 1.4 G 50 mm AFS Not one of Nikon's sharpest....... Nikon Nikkor AF-S 50 mm f/1.4G review - Image resolution - LensTip.com Assuming the D850 focuses 'wide open' in VF MF it's not going to 'pop' very positively with that amount of lens softness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kevin_beretta Posted November 24, 2019 Author Share Posted November 24, 2019 It is indeed not one of the sharpest lenses I have. The sharpest I think in the cabinet now are the 105 2.8, 35 1.8 and for the zooms, the 70-200 VRII. The 24-70 2.8 isn't bad either but the 50 and 85 1.4 primes seems to be a bit softer. Although, the first shot I took with the D850 and the 85 1.4 was a night shot and it was razor sharp. A D850 is a bit harder to shoot properly than the D700 was. However, having recently discovered Capture One and the way it deals with high ISO, I tend to crank the ISO up a bit more and that helps stabilize things. I uploaded a few full-size NEF files if someone wanted to pick through the differences. berettaphoto.com/other/50compare/KAB_8504.NEF berettaphoto.com/other/50compare/KAB_8506.NEF berettaphoto.com/other/50compare/KAB_8509.NEF berettaphoto.com/other/50compare/KAB_8511.NEF I think a 50 1.4 Milvus is in my future... :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now