Firstly I want to say the intention of this is not to have this post denegrate into which is better, because we all know it doesn't matter which you use, but the end product is what we are all concerned with. What i am keen on is the why and the how you use one or the other. As an example, i use film because i feel it simplifies my workflow, meaning I spend less time going through photos and more time shooting. My situation is not that of a pro however - i shoot approx 10-12 weddings a year, all through word of mouth. It would be ridiculously expensive for me to run a D1X (or equivalent) in my situation My workflow is to shoot the day - I shoot 15-20 rolls for each 12 hour wedding. I charge based on an hourly rate + per roll. Approx 50/50 B&W to colour. At the end of each wedding I deliver these to the lab (approx 30 minutes), pick them up (ditto) and put around 300+ into a proof album (around 2-3 hours). The client then gets everything i have shot, including negs and the other 300+ photos I have shot. Film seems to work well for me. What do other people do?