ralph_jensen Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 <p>http://www.dxomark.com/index.php/eng/Image-Quality-Database/Compare-cameras/%28appareil1%29/267|0/%28appareil2%29/295|0/%28onglet%29/0/%28brand%29/Canon/%28brand2%29/Nikon</p> <p>No, of course it doesn't mean much in the real world. That's the point.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike_stemberg Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 <p>...and yesterday he had this discussion: <a href="00VSA5">7D not marked as highly by the DxO Mark as the Nikon D90</a> .<br> <br /> Perhaps there should be a treatise on the how and why's of reading the DxO marking system for whatever camera versus whatever other camera.</p> <h1><br /></h1> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nathangardner Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 <p>why do we keep having "DXO says this..." discussions? We all know what everyone's going to say; nothing we haven't heard or discussed before.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
py-photography Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 <p>Another DxO meanless number<br> It is just a number, and nothing more.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PuppyDigs Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 <p>Well Puppy says, "Bow-Wow!"</p> Sometimes the light’s all shining on me. Other times I can barely see. - Robert Hunter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
elliot1 Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 <p>Actually, it you take the time to read what the numerical results signify, you will understand that the differences between the two cameras are so small that it would be difficult to see a difference in actual photographs. </p> <p>I do not blieve DXO renders opinions. Rather, they present the data they have collected.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roman_thorn1 Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 <p>I personally have no idea what those numbers really mean but if they had no value, what would be the point. I mean they must be field relevant in some way. By the way, technology keeps moving forward. Does that mean the camera you bought last year is no good because something better is on the market...no! I suggest people don't get so hung up on the numbers, just take it with a grain of salt.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas_hardy1 Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 <p>How about a Canon subforum moratorium on threads about what DxO says? </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamie_robertson2 Posted January 10, 2010 Share Posted January 10, 2010 <blockquote> <p>How about a Canon subforum moratorium on threads about what DxO says?</p> </blockquote> <p>How about ignoring DxO altogether? Yes, I'm sure they're mildly relevant to a certain degree. However, it's just a very small portion of a camera that they're looking at and I personally don't think it bears much relevance during the general day to day usage of a camera. A good detailed review like those on DPreview are far more valuable. At least they test every part of a camera that you could ever wish to scrutinise and give a balanced opinion with test shots. Other than getting hold of a camera for yourself, what more could you wish to know?</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now