Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi Everyone,

 

So tell me 'bout drum scans from negatives please. As I understand, the print

quality of drum scanned neg cannot be surpassed since unless I'm mistaken, a

drum scanned print will squeeze out every last bit of detail and resolution in

a neg. I recall seeing some enormous prints at the Getty in LA that were shot

on film with a medium format camera so I can only presume they too were drum

scans given the floor to ceiling size. I have a recent shot on Pan F+ taken

with my RZ67. It's sharp front to back, corner to corner with great detail. I

do have a nice 16x20 traditional print I made of this neg, but I started

thinking about a print several times bigger. So what can I expect quality wise

and cost wise? I'm just shuddering at the thought of a mat and frame at such a

size.

 

Thanks,

 

Marc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As a drum scanner owner/operator, I would of course agree with your assessment of drum scanning ;-). It's hard to beat the quality of a drum scan, especially with greater than 8-10x enlargements. That said, they will not change the laws of physics for you -- if the detail isn't on the film, or the film isn't sharp, a good drum scan will show it.

 

And of course, some drum scanners and their software do better with negatives than others. The much hyped and no longer in production Heidelberg Tango scanner comes to mind. The Tango appears to be fully optimized for tranny work and aimed at the old advertising and magazine markets. I've heard that the software doesn't make it easy to deal with negatives, and that the larger minimum aperture limits the scanner's sharpness and therefore its ability to dig the detail from your film. But it's a real favorite with pre-press houses because it was aimed squarely at them.

 

For fine art work you'll be better served IMHO by one of the so called table top scanners like the Howteks, Optronics ColorGetters, ScanMates, Screens, etc. These scanners were designed to handle a larger range of work including negatives, and have smaller minimum apertures making them sharper machines. You'll also want an operator who has the aptitude for scanning negatives.

 

To sum up then, I think you'll be best served by getting your film scanned by a working photographer using a scanner and software that was designed with negative scanning in mind. There are a number of these people out there but you'll have to look for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Marc, a lot depends on the quality (the lab work..!) of the negs you want to scan... I would not go back to film because of issues involving labs which are not delivering the way they used to... Cost of scanning is relative to where U operate and what kind of access U have to service labs. Other than drum scanners certain Flextights, those with inherent diffusers, will produce excellent results.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There are drum scanners, then there are drum scanners (and software) that handle color negs

well. YMMV. A transparency isn't an issue, a color neg can be depending on the software

driving the scanner and the skill of the operator.

Author “Color Management for Photographers" & "Photoshop CC Color Management" (pluralsight.com)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...