michael_kuhne Posted September 30, 2012 Share Posted September 30, 2012 <p>I compared the results from Pop Photo's test of the K-5 to that of the new K-30 in the September 2012 issue. Their machine measures AF speed down to 0.01 seconds. The K-5's AF speed, with Safox IX, actually came out slightly faster by about 0.05 sec, than that of the K-30 in normal to bright lighting. In dim lighting, the K-5's AF was faster by around 0.5 sec!!</p><p>Safox X in the updated K-5II, however, might be a different story. But indications seem to be- no big shakes with Safox X, maybe a slight improvement in the K-5II, if any.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JosvanEekelen Posted September 30, 2012 Share Posted September 30, 2012 It's 2012. Miracles are part of our not so distant past. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shots worth sharing Posted October 4, 2012 Share Posted October 4, 2012 <p>The Orioles made the playoffs: that's enough of a miracle for me.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolf_weber Posted October 6, 2012 Share Posted October 6, 2012 <p>On the subject of <em>what to expect</em>... Still waiting for <strong>dpreview</strong>'s full review with conclusion. First preview was published in May. Then some updates (with images) but nothing definitive. They seem to have their hands full with the onslaught of recently released DSLRs. Still, it's getting to be rather <em>long in the tooth</em>... Same goes for announced Pentax lenses. </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mountainvisions Posted October 14, 2012 Share Posted October 14, 2012 <p>Have miracles ever occurred with Pentax AF? It's always incremental.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wolf_weber Posted October 29, 2012 Share Posted October 29, 2012 <p>Finally..! Today <strong><em>dpreview</em></strong> came through with the<em> overdue</em> <strong>K-30 review</strong>. Silver Award with an overall score of a very good <strong>78%</strong>. That's a notch higher than for Canon's Rebel T4i, amongst others. Raw image quality almost as good as with the K-5. Metering & focus accuracy somewhat below. Not so good for those who shoot video... Go see for yourself.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr_spocko Posted November 5, 2012 Share Posted November 5, 2012 <p>The issues are not speed but accuracy and this is where previous models such as the K-5 and K-r had problems esp in artificial lighting.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michael_kuhne Posted November 5, 2012 Author Share Posted November 5, 2012 <p>I have seen complaints regarding AF accuracy under artificial lighting, particularly with the K-r. I've not seen as much of that with the K-5. The various lab tests, on the contrary, have indicated good accuracy. I own both models, and have enjoyed good AF accuracy under these circumstances with my copies of both cameras.</p> <p>Whether the K-30 will perform with more consistent accuracy under artificial lighting than the K-5 remains to be seen. Lab tests so far do not seem to indicate that it will.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mr_spocko Posted November 6, 2012 Share Posted November 6, 2012 <p><a href="http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/post/41558227">http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/post/41558227</a><br> I would hope the issues have been resolved. The K-30 is quite a solid camera at that price point with sealing and a decent VF. But sadly we know that models like the D5200 will sell loads, despite lacking some very basic things (esp flash wise)</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now