Jump to content

Do you use a monopod with your nikon DSLR?


sun_p

Recommended Posts

<p>Hi Experts,<br>

Probably a silly question, but I was noticing, I am not very steady with the camera especially outdoors, and also since I am tall, I need to bend a little more than normal. I saw a monopod the other day which would extend to a little over 6 feet and was pretty compact when packed. Carrying a tripod especially if you are walking around is a bit of a problem. The monopod can be a lot easier to slip in. My question really is that,</p>

<p>1. Do any of you use monopods, especially outdoors on the move, when you do not have any specific shoot in mind/paid assignment.<br>

2. Does it provide the required stability to avoid shake. I mean, I know the camera will not move up and down, but, there is a chance of it moving left and right. Silly question. But just want to get your experience on this.</p>

<p>Yes, the tripod remains. but I don't have the luxury to try this out on the field, I can only test it in the shop with no return policy except if its damaged. The only option is to buy it. So wanted to check with the experts on their experience before getting it. Probably I am also beginning to get a little over dependent on the members of this forum, especially with all the advice I have got in the past, right from the first camera to all the lenses and accessories I have picked up, have been influenced by experts here. I couldnt be happier with what I have. :)</p>

<p>Thanks,<br>

Sun</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>The only time I've used a monopod is when I'm in low light. I shoot night club and banquet hall concerts and all too often there is barely enough light. I have two D70s bodies, Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 VC and Sigma 50-150 f/2.8. I very often have to push to 800, even 1600 sometimes, and still I will resort to the monopod, especially with the none stabilized Sigma (boy I'm hoping their recent low supply means they're getting ready to release a stabilized version). I've thought about 50 or 30 1.8, but the lack of DOF is it's own hindrance.</p>

<p>I've tried using a flash (SB600), which has worked many times, but last week at Bar Lubitsch in Hollywood, I couldn't because the room is lined with mirrors. I'm looking forward to upgrading to D300s bodies in the near future to improve the high ISO images.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Hi Sun,<br />I like to carry a Walkingstick/monopod when hiking with my camera..<br />The one I use is this one : <a href="http://www.leki.com/trekking/trekkingPole.php?pID=46">http://www.leki.com/trekking/trekkingPole.php?pID=46</a> <br />I Know, its not a "recognized" as an official monopod, but it works for me , also because its "multi function"....</p>

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I used a monopod all the time when I shot sports. Now that I don't do photojournalism, I use a tripod when I can. My monopod goes everywhere with me, and I do use it when I can't carry a tripod. Another way I use it is to wedge the leg into a fence or hole to make it more steady. But the main reason I carry it in my car is it's smaller than a baseball bat<g>.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Hi Sun,<br>

Yes, I use mine often. I have a sturdy one, Manfrotto 680B. My only complaint is that it is a little heavy. I guess that they do have carbon models but I only had enough money to buy this one. When I shoot the kids in our Upward program playing basketball I will put my tripod head (Ultimate Acratech) on it and it becomes very versatile. <br>

I force it into my body and I can keep it a lot steadier than I can without it. I don't think that you could go wrong getting one. They really are not that expensive ...... well maybe the carbon models are?<br>

Have fun selecting one. You will use it.<br>

phil b<br>

benton, ky</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>i keep both a monopod and tripod in the trunk of the car, but find that the monopod isn't really well suited to action photography, even if it does take some of the pressure off when using a large, heavy lens. since i purchased a bag for tripod/monopod, i find it just as convenient to carry the tripod now. i have very middle of the road manfrotto tripod and monopod -- neither particularly light nor heavy. if you're only looking for some help to support your camera, a monopod isn't a bad investment. </p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I often use one when hiking with my 80-400VR. This one is nice for tall folks:<br>

http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/645080-REG/Benro_452_098.html<br>

I like the lever locks better that the twist type for this use. It's easier for me to make small height adjustments quickly, especially when shooting small things close to the ground. I can often get quite good stability when I can also lean it against something.</p>

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I occasionally use my walking stick, which has been modified to take a tripod screw or Arca-Swiss clamp, but generally only when I'm using a long telephoto lens....like 2 days ago I had a 400 which needed some additional steadiness for some shots of migrating sandhill cranes.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Hi Sun,<br>

Ages ago, I would regularly use a monopod with my 8008s film camera and 300 f4 to reduce camera shake. It really helped because film was slow, usually 100 ISO, and there was no VR. I was trying to photograph deer in the late afternoon and the monopod was indispensable.<br>

Today a monopod seems less useful. VR and low-noise sensors pretty much solve the camera shake problem. Shutter speeds are then limited by stopping the action.<br>

Still, people use them if they need to use big lenses. When I go to sports events, I often see guys using monpods on 300 f2.8s and 400 f2.8s. These big lenses must be tough to handhold. Also the monopod probably makes it easier to smoothly track the action, especially for panning shots.<br>

I still have my monopod but honestly haven't used it with my 300 f4 or 70-200 f2.8, both of which are ~1.5kg. I have no plans or money to buy a mega lens.<br>

Allan</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Hand holding a camera will guarantee some degree of camera motion. A monopod will reduce it. But a monopod will not eliminate camera motion. It is better than hand holding. A tripod will reduce motion even further. A heavier tripod will do even more. Most young, inexperienced photographers in my experience believe they are steady enough to prevent camera motion. They are fooling themselves. You can test this by taking a photo hand held, with a monopod and with a tripod. When you enlarge each one, you will begin to see the lack of sharpness. When you see a really sharp, crisp, enlarged photo, it was taken with the help of a tripod. So if sharpness and clarity is your goal, monopods and tripods are a necessity. If you have any doubt about this, I recommend the book EDGE of DARKNESS by Barry Thornton, which is a thorough examination of the issue.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Of course it will not beat a tripod..... I have another vote for the Leki (or Leki type stick), which is great when you are on the road hiking anyway and I used on a trip to India a few years back. That being said, the only place where I wanted to use it, in the Ajanta Caves, where you cannot use a tripod, the guards were pretty clever and forbid its use, too. Have not used it once but might if I had a 300 f2.8 or the like...</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Hand-held is the least stable and a tripod is the most stable. I have a suggestion you can try to see if the in-between stability of a monopod is to your liking.</p>

<p>Get some strong cord. Make a loop at the end more than large enough to put your foot into, and cut it to a length so you can make a similar loop at the other end, and the distance between the ends is about the distance from the ground to your eye level. Put one loop over the lens and put your foot into the other. Pull up lightly to put tension on the cord - you'll be amazed how much camera shake can be eliminated this way.</p>

<p>As already suggested, shoot the same shot (same shutter speed is mandatory, and use your longest lens) hand held, on your tripod, and using the cord. See if the cord result is to your liking. THEN decide if you want to spend the money for the monopod. Good luck.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...