Jump to content

Do you throw out slides?


Recommended Posts

<p> I tossed half of mine. Fifteen percent of the remaining half was sleeved by category. The rest are in storage cases by category. A huge chunk are people pictures as most were kept for archival/historical/sentimental reasons.</p>

<p>Overall, thinning out felt good and still does.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>My experience is like jim's - when I was scanning in my 'firsts' I discovered more shadow detail etc. was available once they were in digital. After I scanned my 'seconds', I was really glad I had saved them.<br>

I tended also to find totally underexposed slides to be handy as 'dark slides" to put in the slide holder at a spot where I wanted to pause, or to mark the end or start of a series. Totally overexposed were less useful, but I would put a x mark on them for pre-focusing on occasion.<br>

Here are a couple of discards that survived because I used them in making fun of my colleagues' slide shows.</p>

 

<blockquote>

<p>The one on the left is a little overexposed, but you can see.....<br>

The one on the right is a bit dark, but we were ....</p>

</blockquote><div>00Xg16-301785784.jpg.9ac87698ff44d97ba6114c9998d6278d.jpg</div>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>they've got to be pretty botched for me to throw it out. End of roll frame cut in half, completely off exposure/OOF, etc. Otherwise everything is sleeved per roll. At some point i need to either rearrange everything by category or build up a database so i can find individual images etc.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very often. In the past, I almost never threw them and now I have binders full of mistakes. Space is kinda limited, so now I throw out the slides I don't like or don't consider worth scanning or projecting (composition or exposure problems). I just hope I'm not doing something really mean to the environment...
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>"Keeper" seems pretty specific to me, and so does "not keeper"</p>

<p>I reckon that in the 10 years to 2008 I shot well over 50 000 medium format slides. About half of those survived a maximum of two weeks after I took them and indeed I found getting rid of the mistakes, the near dupes, the not very interesting a cathartic process which improved my perceptions of what I had left. </p>

<p>About 70/80% of whats left stayed in strips or part strips, still in sleeves and are filed by trip in ring binders. The other 10/20% got mounted, potentially used, and probably shown to other photographers, stock agencies and so on. </p>

<p>I can't remember ever feeling any regret over what I threw away- indeed the "post " significance of those decisions was infintesmal by comparison to the agonies of making them. I have rarely found any use for or interest in the majority of so called "keepers" that never got mounted. </p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Of interest to those who have responded: A friend, and fellow Photo.net contributor is in the business of long term archival of images...art, documents, pictures etc.<br>

Would it shock anyone to know that the Smithsonian and many other organisations charged with the long term preservation of imagery, use his services to transfer digital images from disk,CD,DVD, back to <strong>colour slide transparencies </strong>for their permanent preservation.<br>

The reason?...the Smithsonian et al, do not have absolute confidence that the current image file formats and media used today will be around in 20 years time, let alone 200.<br>

So the answer Chris, is...don't throw out your slides.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>The solution was the comment from Shadforth. The slides ARE are in an archival state.<br>

In this headlong dash to "convert" ourselves to digital imagery<br>

the question of permanence returns to mind frequently.<br>

And as an old (over 60 years of age) person the idea of permanence tends to be more nf topic than ever before.<br>

If somebody is interested in a slide , I duplicate same as an archival digital file, if only because the file can in current circumstances be used in so many different ways. The slides (some 25,000) of mostly railways and transportation devices in the world, live in metal slide boxes, with dessicant packets which are removed and heated to remove moisuture on a regular basis.<br>

Duds, are often discovered upon delivery of the processed slides first time round.<br>

Duds not discarded then are reviewedand then kept or place in a file for friends to scour through and then if they don't want them, they are the dropped through a large shredding machine to be reduced to minute nothings.<br>

And I still use my Nikon F100 to photograph using E-6 slide film.<br>

Processing varies by supplier, may revert to sending E-6 stateside for processing at Dwayne's.<br>

More costly however can assured the slides will be processed properly. Currently sing a roll of 36 every two weeks, give or take.</p>

<p> </p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I store my 35mm slides in binders, in the order in which the images where made. So, I keep each roll together as a roll rather than resorting the images based on some other categorization. I tend to look for slides based on when and where I made the original image so this sorting makes sense for me.<br>

If I take slides out of a binder for, say, a slide show, then when it came time to return the slides to the binder I would find it quite hard to figure out where a given slide belongs if I did not keep every slide in each roll (except for half-frames and the like at the start and end of a roll).<br>

For medium format slides I much prefer handling the slides as strips of three. This means that it would almost never make sense to discard since I would be discarding three images rather than just one. Plus, since the medium format slides are not mounted they take up very little space.<br>

So, I keep pretty much every slide. Yes, I have quite a few binders!</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I'm amused by the idea that the archival quality of slides should mean that they should be kept irrespective of their visual qualities. Sure, the fact that they'll last a long time is important for those you want to keep, but keeping poor or meaningless images just because they're archival strikes me as being a bit like keeping your food packaging because it won't decompose! There's lots of things that we can do- I guess I'd just imagined that people would let what they <em>wanted</em> to do drive their actions, not what they <em>can</em> do.</p>

<p>Equally I'm puzzled by keeping all of one slides in strips- because it means that you never get the pleasure of seeing your work projected and thats unfortunate.</p>

<p>But the man who keeps them all because they might, just might, turn out to be of real interest or value later, now there's a true artistic spirit, confident and optimistic! Every photographer should have a statistician for a friend. I'll start keeping mine when Flickr goes offline and the stock agency's databases close :-)</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I throw away most slides if they are not good enough. I only very rarely keep a second: if i keep one it is usually of a person. My feeling is that if I have to wonder whether the shot is any good then it's probably not and out it goes. I am a little easier on myself now I am largely digital. If two pictures are equally good but different - I still usually only keep one - I have to make a choice like any other picture editor.</p>
Robin Smith
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Wow, after all these responses, I'm feeling careless. I throw away about 80% (maybe more) of my 35mm slides soon after receiving them. I don't think I'm overly picky, but I really don't want to save a slide that doesn't immediately stike me as being good. I do a lot less MF and since they come in strips, I save them unless I cut them up for mounting and don't want what's left.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>"I have a friend who wants to scan all his slides and then throw them away." Not a very good idea, as alluded to in the comments by Shadforth and Bryce. Today, everybody can read a jpg on a CD or DVD. But in 20 years? Certaintly by our grandchildren's time they will have no idea what those shiny plastic discs are, let alone that they contain photos or have the equipment and software to view them. Only a fraction will ultimately be transferred from today's media to tomorrow's any more than our 5.25 floppy discs from the 1980s got transferred. But a color slide can be held up to the light and it's immediately apparent what it is, the same as Matthew Brady's glass plates. And if you still have the original color slide, you can always copy it to whatever the latest technical format of the year 2100 that no one has yet envisioned. Throw it away, and you're stuck with 2010 technology forever.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

<p ><a name="00Xfyx"></a>"<em><a href="../photodb/user?user_id=3733424">Eddy d</a> <a href="../member-status-icons"></a>, Nov 13, 2010; 06:47 p.m.</em></p>

 

<p><em>I have a friend who wants to scan all his slides and then throw them away."</em></p>

<p>That seems like a <em>rather foolish </em>move to me. What happens if he loses those scanned images? He's SOL.<br>

I have scanned a lot of mine, but will never get rid of the originals. Most of mine are unmounted anyway, as I used transparency film as most would use negative film. Prints were made of the transparencies. </p>

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...