Jump to content

Do You Think the Canon 50 1.8 or 50 1.4 is Better ?


jon_kobeck1

Recommended Posts

The 1.4 is a good 2.0 lens. The 1.8 is a good 4.0 lens. Of course the 1.8 is a flimsy piece of plastic and the 1.4 is a bit

more solidly built.

 

If you can at all afford it, the 1.4 to me is a sure winner. It's not all about the .5 stop of extra light.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Please add to my previous comment on the other thread . . .

 

If the sole premise of choice between the two lenses is the ability to manage the Depth of Field at the widest aperture, then there is not much difference and when using either lens, it will be more about technique, than either lens, itself.

 

Another way of looking at it: on an APS-C body, with each lens wide open and at a Subject Distance of 10ft:

 

The 1.4 has about 7inches DoF.

 

The F1.8 has about 9.5 inches DoF.

 

Both lenses require good focusing technique, especially in low light, IMO.

 

I generally use centre point, have it attached to the `*` button (CF4, I think) and I am aware that the AF works on contrast differences and that the red squares are not the limit of the AF boundary, it extends beyond them.

 

I often use focus and recompose, but am very aware of any parallax error, when recomposing.

 

In low light I often use MF and use the red square to confirm it.

 

I use the F1.4 on a 20D and a 5D, and can work in very low light and with very small DoF adequately.

 

WW<div>00Q06b-52979584.JPG.6570e8d31babda011d033916fa93277b.JPG</div>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...