allan_martin Posted January 12, 2013 Share Posted January 12, 2013 <p>Hello!<br> Im looking for a couple advices on my set of lenses.<br> Right now I have a 35mm, a 18-105 and a 70-300.<br> Im planning on getting a 17-50 sigma and leave it with the 70-300 as my 2 main lenses. 99% of the time I wont be able to take more than 2 lenses with me so that's why this is a tough decision for me.<br> Is the 17-50 + 70-300 a nice set for most cases? I cant tell if Ill be missing those 20mm in range really...<br> Was hoping you guys could enlighten me a little bit!<br> Thank you!</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leslie_cheung Posted January 12, 2013 Share Posted January 12, 2013 <p>You will be fine, tho I do like the 85-100mm (FX equivalent) range for portraiture. Just make do, frame differently, maybe move around, crop in pp etc...Whether the combo works or not, you'd have to decide for yourself after awhile.</p> <p> </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allan_martin Posted January 12, 2013 Author Share Posted January 12, 2013 <p>Oh I have a 85mm for portraits too but thats so specific that I didnt include it in the post.</p> <p>I asked about the 17-50 + 70-300 for general use, especially when travelling, as I like landscapes, nature, urban areas, architecture and general use.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andylynn Posted January 12, 2013 Share Posted January 12, 2013 <p>That sounds like a good travel kit. Unless it's for something particular like portraits I don't think that gap is a big problem. Though when I had that camera I did like the 18-105 as a travel lens for versatility.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
drjoder Posted January 12, 2013 Share Posted January 12, 2013 <p>I have a D90 (same crop factor as D7000, I believe) and my main two lenses are the Tamron 17-50 f/2.8 and the Nikkor 70-300 f/4.5-5.6 VR. I shoot a lot of landscapes, abstracts, cityscapes, some street, etc. I very, very rarely find myself needing those 20mm in the middle.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ShunCheung Posted January 12, 2013 Share Posted January 12, 2013 <p>I doubt that the little gap between 50mm and 70mm will be an issue.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eric_arnold Posted January 12, 2013 Share Posted January 12, 2013 <p>i have that same setup. you wont notice the 20mm gap.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allan_martin Posted January 12, 2013 Author Share Posted January 12, 2013 <p>Thank you a lot guys! Feel more comfortable now. Cya.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Two23 Posted January 12, 2013 Share Posted January 12, 2013 <p>My usual travel kit is a Nikon 17-55mm f2.8 and a Nikon 80-400mm VR. I have never missed not having the 55-80mm covered.</p> <p>Kent in SD</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wouter Willemse Posted January 13, 2013 Share Posted January 13, 2013 <p>As others, I don't think you'll find yourself missing a whole lot. But if you want to make sure for yourself (as we all have a different style and preferences), it's fairly easy to do so: EXIF data of your existing images, or use the 18-105 to see what you'd be missing.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wilpenusa Posted January 14, 2013 Share Posted January 14, 2013 <p>Sigma makes a 17-70mm f2.8-4 w/OS and HSM lens that covers that range. I have it and like it much more than the kit lens. <em> have seen it for about 400.00,US</em></p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now