Jeffrey L.T. von Glück Posted August 12, 2010 Share Posted August 12, 2010 <p>What has anyone's experience been with the <em>true</em> colour temperature of those new "squiggly" compact fluorescent lamps (CFLs)? Most CFLs are sold with a "warm white" designation and a marked temperature of 2700 Kelvin on the package. The older fluorescent tubes had differing wavelengths present in a single output.</p> <p>I remember many moons ago we used various CC filters, depending on the colour temperature of the various fluorescent tubes, e.g. cool white, daylight, warm white. It was dicey with slide film to get it just right, especially with mixed sources.</p> <p>I'm thinking that a four-layer colour negative emulsion like Fuji markets may be better with these bulbs in available light than using a transparency film. I'm just not sure how faithful to either daylight or the old incandescent lamps the CFLs are.</p> Jeffrey L. T. von Gluck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nicholas_rapak Posted August 12, 2010 Share Posted August 12, 2010 <p>CFLs don't produce a steady color temperature. The mercury vapor creates spectral spikes that, when combined, produce about 2700K apparent color temp. Fourth-layer color films will do better than normal films, but they will by no means produce excellent results. </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roger_smith4 Posted August 12, 2010 Share Posted August 12, 2010 <p>Here's a color corrected version (PS autocolors)</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
randrew1 Posted August 13, 2010 Share Posted August 13, 2010 <p>Fluorescent light sources are always a problem because, as Nicholas says, their spectrums are full of spikes. In some ways these difficult light sources are like problem colors (heavenly blue morning glories that may reproduce magenta, azo green fabric dyes that may reproduce brown, etc.) All of these problems get better when a film has more accurate color reproduction. Accuracy in this case is defined by what the human eye sees. There are several ways to get film to reproduce color more like the human eye. Fuji uses a fourth layer in many of their products and achieves good results. Kodak films use a combination of spectral sensitizing dyes and DIR couplers that also produce accurate colors. IMHO, the Portra 160 and 400 films are unbeatable for color accuracy. They will do well with fluorescent lights.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey L.T. von Glück Posted August 13, 2010 Author Share Posted August 13, 2010 <p>I will experiment with different stock. I have a freezer loaded with bricks of Portra 160 and 400, plus loads of loose rolls of Fuji. I had used Fuji Pro 800Z at the NY auto show back in April and was satisfied with its rendition of mixed lighting situations. I haven't had the chance to experiment with the Portra yet.</p> <p>Thanks for all of your comments and advice.</p> Jeffrey L. T. von Gluck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now