conrad_stoll1 Posted October 19, 2006 Share Posted October 19, 2006 I know that either of these is the lens I want for basketball, but for the life of me I can't choose. The 100 would be a little better for getting in nice and close, but its slightly slower. I've heard that its sharper than the 85 though. The 85 is faster than the 100 but i'm not sure how sharp it is at the f1.8 aperture, which is where i'd be using it the most by far. The price on the two is basically the same, within 30 bucks. Other than basketball, i'd likely be doing some volleyball work with either lens (100 would probably be better for that) and maybe use one as a backup for night time football on my close quarters camera (maybe). My other interests include nature (closeups of flowers etc., as well as scenery) and portraits. I know both lenses are good for portraits, but does anyone have a favorite for either of those other aspects? My principal focus for this thing though is basketball, so if anyone has any feelings about either one vs. the other for that, please let me know. Thanks Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rainer_t Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 you're not going to do a big mistake with either of them ... check the tests a photozone ... http://www.photozone.de/8Reviews/lenses/canon_85_18/index.htm http://www.photozone.de/8Reviews/lenses/canon_100_2/index.htm If the reach of the 100 is better for you take this one, I don't think that the third of an f-stop (that you loose) will make a big difference. I never tried the 100/2 ... but the 85/1.8 has excellent AF (fast accurate) even in low light, and does perform very well wide open (albeit it wins a littel when stopped down). Rainer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robert_meyers Posted October 20, 2006 Share Posted October 20, 2006 The 100/2 is by far my favorite lens in the Canon lineup. Fast and sharp. For what your doing though, you might want to consider if 100mm is long enough. You might want to consiter the 135mm... but it is drastically more expensive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
conrad_stoll1 Posted October 20, 2006 Author Share Posted October 20, 2006 Honestly i'm trying to decide if the 100 is too long... For basketball i'm literally sitting 3 feet behind the back line a few feet next to the hoop. For volleyball I can sit on the center line. For swimming I can go anywhere I want. Its quite a tough call honestly, heh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leopoldstotch Posted October 21, 2006 Share Posted October 21, 2006 although I never owneed it, the 85mm 1:1.8 is said to very slow focusing, which isn't ideal for sports. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark u Posted October 21, 2006 Share Posted October 21, 2006 ? I think Leopold is referring to the Canon 85mm f/1.2 (Mk I), rather than the f/1.8 lens, though actually with basketball it's quite possible to shoot using manual focus, since you can predict where the action is going to occur. You didn't mention what body you are shooting with. I think 85mm is probably as long as you'll need (and you'll probably want at least a 50mm as well) for shooting basketball with a 1.6 crop body. If you're shooting full frame, you might want to add the 135mm f/2 instead of the 50mm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
conrad_stoll1 Posted October 21, 2006 Author Share Posted October 21, 2006 yeah i use a 10D (hopefully eventually to be a 30D) the 85 seems like a pretty good option, since its probably close enough, and the extra light can't hurt... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
carl_auer2 Posted October 22, 2006 Share Posted October 22, 2006 The three most popular lenses for basketball in the Canon lineup are the 50 1.8, 85 1.8, and 70-200 2.8. The 50 because it is cheap, the 70-200 for, well being a 70-200 2.8 and the 85 1.8 because it is very fast in AF and a sharp lens. The 100 is a good lens, but some feel it is a tad too long for basketball under the hoop, and a tad too short for mid court. I shoot basketball with two lenses and two bodies. If I am strobing, it is the 70-200 2.8 on a 1D and 85 1.8 on a Xt. If light is bad and I am not strobing, the 50 on the 1D and 85 on the Xt. The 85 is the ideal focal length for a 1.6 sensor with basketball Volleyball is a different story altogether. I like a 70-200 and a 300 2.8 for that, but under low light conditions, the 135 f2 is an awesome lens. Again, the 100 is a little short. 85 is even shorter but it is usable. Go with the 85. You will not be upset with the choice. Oh, and yes, the 85 1.2 is slow, much slower than the 85, but it is still a awesome indoor sports lens, just not ideal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
conrad_stoll1 Posted October 22, 2006 Author Share Posted October 22, 2006 Thanks carl And the only aspect of volleyball i'd be using the lens for would be floor side shots of digs basically, since either an 85 or a 100 is plenty good for that, since its so close. I already use a 70-200 for everything else (or a 300 f2.8 when the office will let me borrow one that all of us share). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now