jitendra_katre Posted May 4, 2010 Share Posted May 4, 2010 <p>how does canon 100-400 compares with tamron 200-500 at 400 m.m.?</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ian riches Posted May 4, 2010 Share Posted May 4, 2010 <p>Very similar, according to Photozone:</p> <p>Tamron review: http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/296-tamron-af-200-500mm-f5-63-di-ld-if-sp-lab-test-report--review<br> Canon review: http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/204-canon-ef-100-400mm-f45-56-usm-l-is-test-report--review</p> <p>Remember though, the Canon has IS - which means if you are handholding its effective-in-the-field sharpness is likely to be better, unless you always shoot in the brightest of sunshine.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yakim_peled1 Posted May 4, 2010 Share Posted May 4, 2010 <p> <br> <p dir="ltr">YMMV but IS and USM would be enough for me not to even consider the Tamron.</p> <p dir="ltr"> </p> <p dir="ltr">Happy shooting,</p> <p dir="ltr">Yakim.</p> <p></p> <p dir="ltr"> </p> <br> </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim_j2 Posted May 4, 2010 Share Posted May 4, 2010 <p>I'm with Yakim, the IS and USM is well worth the $$$$ difference you are talking about IMHO.<br> I wouldn't even "speculate" what the difference in resale value will be . . . say 5 years down the road!<br> I'm not knocking Tamron by any means! I have their 17-50mm f/2.8 and I love it! But I also purchased it "used" with "very considerable dollar difference" than what I would have spent for the Canon L with similiar focal lengths.</p> <p>I would buy the 100-400 and if you think you really need to get to 500mm, then get the Canon 1.4X TC later down the road. It too will hold it's resale value.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim_j2 Posted May 4, 2010 Share Posted May 4, 2010 <p>This Hummingbird shot was taken Hand Held with the Canon 100-400 w/ EF 1.4X TC as an example;</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim_j2 Posted May 4, 2010 Share Posted May 4, 2010 <p>Another example of the 100-400 IS w/ EF 1.4X TC</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jitendra_katre Posted May 5, 2010 Author Share Posted May 5, 2010 <p>how about these,.. all are shot with tamron 200-500,handheld.<img src="http://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=1&view=att&th=124e20ae5eef9113&attid=0.12&disp=attd&realattid=f_g1vqqf66&zw" alt="" /><img src="http://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=1&view=att&th=124e20ae5eef9113&attid=0.11&disp=attd&realattid=f_g1vqq5jt&zw" alt="" /><img src="http://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=1&view=att&th=124e20ae5eef9113&attid=0.6&disp=attd&realattid=f_g1vqpsck&zw" alt="" /><img src="http://mail.google.com/mail/?ui=1&view=att&th=124e20ae5eef9113&attid=0.2&disp=attd&realattid=f_g1vqpgk3&zw" alt="" /></p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now