Jump to content

canon 100-400 and tamron 200-500


Recommended Posts

<p>Very similar, according to Photozone:</p>

<p>Tamron review: http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/296-tamron-af-200-500mm-f5-63-di-ld-if-sp-lab-test-report--review<br>

Canon review: http://www.photozone.de/canon-eos/204-canon-ef-100-400mm-f45-56-usm-l-is-test-report--review</p>

<p>Remember though, the Canon has IS - which means if you are handholding its effective-in-the-field sharpness is likely to be better, unless you always shoot in the brightest of sunshine.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I'm with Yakim, the IS and USM is well worth the $$$$ difference you are talking about IMHO.<br>

I wouldn't even "speculate" what the difference in resale value will be . . . say 5 years down the road!<br>

I'm not knocking Tamron by any means! I have their 17-50mm f/2.8 and I love it! But I also purchased it "used" with "very considerable dollar difference" than what I would have spent for the Canon L with similiar focal lengths.</p>

<p>I would buy the 100-400 and if you think you really need to get to 500mm, then get the Canon 1.4X TC later down the road. It too will hold it's resale value.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...