I've been shooting 3 of the Leica 50's recently, the 50 Summilux, the current version of the Summicron, and most recently the previous version of the Summicron. While the current Summicron is blazingly sharp, I mostly shoot people ( http//www.kirktuck.com) and I've found the newest Summi a bit biting at around 5.6 or f8. Didn't realize it was so clinical until I picked up the previous version. That lens is sharp but at the same time just a bit smoother. Such a thing as too sharp? Any other shooters notice these difference? With landscapes, products, details, etc. the most current lens is very three dimensional. Am I just conditioned to accept as correct the softer look from previous generations or what? <p> Vaguely conflicted in Austin.