Jump to content

C.Z. Jena 58mm Biotar Question


Recommended Posts

<p>Here is the same lens but with the front "beauty" ring removed. Clearly some of the writing was purposefully ground away and covered with the ring. Why? Same lens but two different serial numbers is unusual, no? Done at the factory or after? This lens came on an early Zeiss Ikon Hexacon that looks like a Contax D, if that helps. Thanks!</p><div>00acBi-482299584.jpg.a9d4d2bd32c7eef1851e91fabc28bcaf.jpg</div>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Here's the camera it came on. It looks like a Pentacon but it's Hexacon. I would be delighted to learn if this is the long lost missing link camera that is worth a small fortune. I'm not holding my breath on that one :o)</p><div>00acC2-482301584.jpg.cc8f2a82d6080a97e9f16291e9e567a1.jpg</div>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Replacing "Carl Zeiss" by anonymous "C.Z.", the red "T" by a red lozenge is part of the Cold War goings on that was insisted upon to allow sales of the lens in/to "the West.<br>Either done at the facory (most likely) or at the importer.<br>The camera itself started out as a Contax D(resden).
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>This period was one of considerable confusion over who owned what trademarks, and where.<br /> The Hexacon was an discount export name in the mid-50s for the Contax, which at that time was also sold as Pentacon by Prakticon Co, among others, in the USA. Here is an ad from the period for the Hexacon 35 with a C.Z. lens, likely the Biotar.</p>

<p>Here was the irenic cooperation of the West and East at the time:</p>

<blockquote>

<p><em>[referring to a Kyocera discussion of 1982 about the ground-breaking Contax S]</em><br /> Back in the fifties, however, the West German company Zeiss Ikon<br />AG in Stuttgart did not regard the matter to be quite this pleasant.<br /> Beyond that, Zeiss Ikon of Stuttgart would generate a veritable flood of<br />law suits against VEB (People's-Owned Enterprise) Zeiss Ikon within<br />the VVB (Union of People's-Owned Enterprises) Mechanik Dresden.<br />Clearly this was to protect the trademarks »Zeiss Ikon« and »Contax« for<br />themselves.<br /> Alexander Schulz <em>Contax S</em>, Lindemanns Verlag p.62.</p>

</blockquote>

<p>One way or another (C.Z. Jena, aus Jena, etc.) items meant for export to the West often were altered or rebranded. You'll note inconsistency in branding in the Peerless ad, though, perhaps reflecting exactly when the items were imported.</p><div>00acCP-482305584.jpg.567dd59815be299bf1d5973249a4d2e6.jpg</div>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I'm sorry to say, Louis, that what you have is a Cold War curiosity rather than a treasure, though it has some collector value to completionists.<br /> It is likely that if you pried off the Hexacon plate, you'd find a defaced mark although some may have been made plain for just such contingencies.<br /> The <a href="../classic-cameras-forum/00XFGW">Contax D models</a> are often good shooters. The original Contax S was more fragile, at least in my experience. The shutter seems to be the main problem area.<br /> <br /> I have only a sample of the variants, I'm afraid.<br /> See Dr. Mike Otto's site (<a href="http://www.praktica-collector.de/SLR_all.htm">link</a>) for much more detail.</p><div>00acCZ-482315584.jpg.630b3a254322076762e98c4239c8bfd2.jpg</div>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I've seen the Hexacon in the old Peerless ads too. I inherited all my dad's back issues of various photo magazines dating as far back as 1952. Compared to some of the other gear advertised, the Hexacon (and other Peerless brands like Rival) were quite a bargain. Thanks for posting.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>There were court battles about whether the East German or West German half of Carl Zeiss would get to use the trademark, eventually the West German side won. The East German half continued to use the trademark only inside East Germany, but exports had to be re-branded.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Just recently there was an article in the german camera collectors' magazine "PhotoDeal" covering lenses for the Praktisix camera and also mentioning the name plate ring issue. There were quite a few different versions, many CZJ lenses were justed marked "Jena", later "aus JENA" (from Jena) and "aus JENA (DDR)". These were name versions for the west-german market, maybe there were other versions for other export countries, the article does not mention the "CZ Jena" version on your lens.<br>

They also had to change the lens names, the lens names pre-war were copyrighted by Zeiss Oberkochen. In most cases they used abbreviatons like "Bm" for Biometar and "B" for Biogon, your lens does not have a name at all. </p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As many have said.. and in the 2nd or 3rd post. Likely done in export dept or at the re-seller for all the reasons mentioned. Fear of copyright infinrgement, unsettled or recently settled international case....with fear of repercussions. East /West tensions etc. I've often read/seen all the Contax D variations. We have the no-name version, just like the Kiew no-names versions.. my fav on this theme and like all the others taking place in the 50s is the is the Fender/Gretsch fight over the name Broadcaster. Leo Fender was using this on a guitar and Gretsch used this on ther drum kit. So while this was being hashed out they simply made guitars wit hno-name. Collectors refer to these affectionaley as "Nocasters" Sorry I digress!

I personally want one that simply says Contax without a designator D/E etc! I think the Biotar from this series is great!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...