Jump to content

"bleeding" between some negative frames -- development? camera?


todd_b1

Recommended Posts

<p>Hi,<br>

I am noticing that there is some "bleeding" on several of my negatives. Please take a look at the attached image.<br>

-- The negative densities are OK. I don't know why these look all blown out, so please try to ignore that. (This was scanned on a plain-jane scanner with sleeved negatives, I just wanted to make sure I captured the defect).<br>

-- I've boxed in three areas where you can see the image bleeding outside of the frame: top of both frames bleeding off the top (and off to the right for the second image). Upper left of second frame bleeding out.<br>

Is this my processing?<br>

Many Thanks!<br>

Todd<br>

<img src="http://i.imgur.com/PlSq4L5l.jpg" alt="" width="640" height="283" /></p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Hi Ellis, on the light table I think the densities look OK, there is some detail there. That said I am usually completely wrong. I'll scan the contact sheet when I can, my scanner can handle that (just not negatives). Massive overexposure would break out of the frame like that?</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>It's halation. Happens when the sun or other extremely bright light is at the frame edge. I have a few photos like that. Doesn't matter whether the frame is properly exposed or overexposed, although overexposure may contribute a bit to the effect. Anti-halation treatments help but can't prevent extreme light sources from bleeding into the usually-unexposed frame margins. Some films and film bases are better than others, some are much worse.</p>

<p>More extreme examples occur with some infrared films with light piping, which is why some IR films must be loaded in the dark. The exposed leader can pipe light well inside the cassette or rolled film. Reportedly some Lucky films during the early-mid 2000s had little anti-halation treatment and were vulnerable to this effect, but I never got a chance to try them.</p>

<p>Here's an example from one of my 35mm negatives, with part of the frame edge visible. T-Max 400 at EI 800 in Microphen. I've seen this in some medium format films too, where the halation spills over into the next frame due to the thinner margins with some cameras. #1 points to the halation. The others are various types of flare.</p>

<p>Sorry about the grisly content of the photo. It's all I have scanned to illustrate the halation effect. It's a deer that was decapitated by a game officer after it was accidentally struck and killed by a vehicle on a rural road.</p>

<p><img src="http://static.photo.net/attachments/bboard/00Q/00QegW-67495584.jpg" alt="" width="435" height="655" /></p>

<p><a href="/black-and-white-photo-film-processing-forum/00QeZm">Previous discussion</a>.<br>

<a href="/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=001eif">Other examples of halation</a>.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>I think Elis has the most likely source of the problem. Have you had the camera serviced? This sort of edge light leak is likely to be a pressure plate issue. A jarring of the camera can cause this. The plate spring may be old, the plate may be slightly out of alignment or even dirty of slightly bent (this is last is unlikely, unless it got bent while open.</p>
Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>Don't make this too complicated. Look at the other threads I linked to, and other examples you can find online. It's just <a href="https://www.google.com/#q=halation&safe=off">halation</a> and can occur anywhere in the frame with sun directly in the shot in an otherwise normally exposed photo; or with other extremely bright light sources in some situations.</p>

<p>The pressure plate won't completely block halation. For similar reasons a closed 35mm film cassette's light seals won't prevent light piping with some IR films. I've seen this effect with all of my cameras, 35mm and MF. We just don't notice it when it occurs in the middle of the frame. No particular need to worry about the pressure plate unless there are other indications that it's out of adjustment and film flatness has been compromised - such as obvious focus problems on the same plane with a fast lens used wide open, which may indicate film buckling or curling, or irregular lines around the rebates between the frames and edges.</p>

<p>The phenomenon was first noted in a <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=DLZIAAAAMAAJ&q=%22halation%22&dq=%22halation%22&hl=en&ei=hN0_Tt2wLMbprQea17TjDQ&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=4&ved=0CDQQ6AEwAw#v=snippet&q=%22halation%22&f=false">1901 publication</a> and, while undesirable for most conventional photographic uses, has led to the development of other products such as 3M's optical lighting film. Over the decades of film development <a href="http://books.google.com/books?id=9cIyAAAAMAAJ&q=%22halation%22&dq=%22halation%22&hl=en&ei=Bew_Trj1D5DJrQe0xfEC&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=9&ved=0CEMQ6AEwCDha">various bases and anti-halation coatings were tried to minimize the effect</a>. The distinctive blue-green dyes that are readily soluble in water with some European films (notably Efke several years ago) were the anti-halation coatings. Kodak and Ilford anti-halation coatings are less water soluble but I've noticed they seem to be more soluble in highly alkaline developers. However I'm not sure whether the purplish-blue offal is anti-halation, sensitizing dyes or both.</p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...