sprouty Posted January 16, 2008 Share Posted January 16, 2008 I'm just about at the end of my 30-day trial period for both Lightroom and Capture NX. Before I buy though, I was wondering if anyone else has had better luck with LR over NX with respect to RAW conversion? Pretty much everything you read favors the Nikon software for acurate skin tones and colors, but my experience is the exact opposite. Almost every image I've worked on seems to look better in Lightroom, not to mention the vastly superior workflow. And if it matters, my monitor is calibrated. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoni_perlmutter Posted January 16, 2008 Share Posted January 16, 2008 Why should you care if Capture NX works better for others? If Lightroom is what you prefer then keep Lightroom. Let others keep what they like. I am a Capture NX user. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sprouty Posted January 16, 2008 Author Share Posted January 16, 2008 I was only wondering why because I am in the process of choosing between the two applications and I was having better luck with Lightroom than Capture NX. Considering that most every opinion I've read states that NX does a better job of converting NEF's I was simply curious if I might be doing something wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl Stone Posted January 16, 2008 Share Posted January 16, 2008 Lightroom has archiving capabilities in addition to editing capabilities. I have, and use Capture NX, but I'm considering Lightroom because of archiving, and it has to be faster than Picture Project. Lightroom also works seamlessly with Photoshop. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_burkus Posted January 16, 2008 Share Posted January 16, 2008 I have both and I prefer Lightroom in terms of work flow, ease of use and results straight from the conversion. Moreover, if you ever decide to switch from Nikon cameras, Lightroom supports a wide range of RAW files. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoni_perlmutter Posted January 16, 2008 Share Posted January 16, 2008 After using quite a few products (including Lightroom, which I thought was quite good) I settled on NX for NEFs because in my case it does the best rendering. If you feel that Lightroom does a better job for you, then by all means, use it. If there was clearly 1 best product most people would be using it. Apparently different people feel differently about PP products and that probably accounts for the the product glut in the market. I can only reiterate: you needn't give a toss about what anyone thinks about anything; use the product that does the job for you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl Stone Posted January 16, 2008 Share Posted January 16, 2008 "I can only reiterate: you needn't give a toss about what anyone thinks about anything; use the product that does the job for you." It's perfectly acceptable to ask about these things, as one can learn why people prefer one over the other. That is how folks learn about the features that might be useful to them, or not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoni_perlmutter Posted January 17, 2008 Share Posted January 17, 2008 In this case the asker of the question already has formed an opinion about whether he/she prefers product "X" to product "Y". I failed to notice if Photoshop was part of the equation. If yes, it wasn't mentioned. I would continue to use NX whether or not Photoshop was part of my "workflow". It is not. I use specific products for specific needs; IMatch for data base organisation (powerful software), Noise Ninja for noise removal (as required), Picture Window and/or Bibble for "pixel-peeping", and, as stated above NX for rendering NEFs into whatever. For as long as NEFs are the issue NX remains a viable choice. For my Fuji RAWs I use Bibble or PW, for scanned photos, VueScan and Noise Ninja an so forth. Horses for courses. I should think that the very best way to learn how to use a product is to actually use that product and experiment with it and check results. It seems that has been done here. That's how folks learn about the features that might be useful to them . . . sp has the answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sprouty Posted January 17, 2008 Author Share Posted January 17, 2008 Thanks for the input guys. I was thinking that I might being doing something stupid and that someone might offer a "make sure you have this feature selected" tip. Apparently that's not the case and so I'm pretty sold on Lightroom (though I will really miss those control points in NX). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tonybeach Posted January 19, 2008 Share Posted January 19, 2008 You might want to take a closer look at the reds and greens. Adobe generates flat results, but if you don't mind then stick with Lightroom. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now