hwyblues Posted October 18, 2005 Share Posted October 18, 2005 Hello I would like to digitize my father's collection of slides. I have a minolta dimage scan elite II scanner and realize that it will give me the best results. I do not have enough free time (or patience) to scan each slide with the dimage. Instead, I would like to digitize all of the slides using my 20D camera. The family would then be able to view them easily using a computer or dvd player. If I needed to make a print, I would use the dimage to scan the slide. I have thought about projecting the slides with a slide projector and then taking a digital picture of the image. I have also thought about using a macro lens to photograph the slides while on a light box. I assume that using a macro lens and a light box would result in a better image, but would appreciate advice on what others think would work best. I also would appreciate advice on what type of lens/light box would work best for "scanning" the slides. I do not have a good macro lens and was thinking of purchasing the canon 100 mm macro lens. Would this lens work for this project, or should I look at getting something else? Thanks in advance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erickpro Posted October 18, 2005 Share Posted October 18, 2005 If you have the scanner and a way to take a picture of the slides would you test it and see what gives you better results and compare both? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark u Posted October 18, 2005 Share Posted October 18, 2005 You may find the following comparisons instructive: http://www.andromeda.com/people/ddyer/photo/slide-transfer.html It's noticeable that even Ohnar doesn't seem to have bothered to produce a slide duplicator to use with crop DSLRs (which would require less than lifesize magnification to capture the full frame). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark u Posted October 19, 2005 Share Posted October 19, 2005 Maybe you should consider an Epson 4990 to do batch scans. It won't give the same quality as your Minolta, but it will probably give better results overall than the other methods you are considering. http://www.photo-i.co.uk/Reviews/interactive/Epson%204990/Page%201.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonathan_ratzlaff Posted October 19, 2005 Share Posted October 19, 2005 A slide copier on a macro lens is much faster than any scanner. The colour and resolution are on a par with a flatbed scanner, but it is faster. Use a flash for illumination, and shoot with the camera tethered to the computer. you get a better view that way. No matter what you do you will have to tweak the final result, however my opinion is that this is faster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neil.r Posted October 29, 2005 Share Posted October 29, 2005 A lightbox (or a CRT* monitor with a blank white screen), some sort of slide holder (table clip stands for holding notes/pictures), and possibly a table-top stand for the camera would work nicely. I personally like the idea because its format independant. Assuming the lightbox is big enough, you could use the same technique to 'scan' 120 transparencies. * LCD monitor pixels show up at close range, I would avoid them for this purpose. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now