j_kluska Posted September 12, 2007 Share Posted September 12, 2007 I like to shoot both landscapes and people and am looking for some opinions on what would be the best tele/telezoom (200 to 400mm range)value for the Sony A100. Sony's current line seems a bit limited and the Zeiss glass a bit pricey. I've had bad luck with the low end Sigma's, so I'm hesitant... Suggestions??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
richard_evans6 Posted September 12, 2007 Share Posted September 12, 2007 Minolta invented the first auto focus SLR in 1985, the Maxxum 7000. All Minolta lenses made since then are compatible with the Alpha. Many Minolta lenses are superb. I own a few of them such as the 28-135 f4, the 24-85 f3.5, the 50 f1.7 and the absolute best is the 100 f2.8 macro. I spent a total of $400 on all of these lenses by searching the internet. I use craigslist because I prefer to buy locally and I want to inspect what I'm getting. Many people though have had good luck with ebay. A Minolta lens that has been well cared for will last for many more years and the optical quality is better than many new lenses. A great place to read reviews of all compatible A-mount lenses is Dyxum.com. Once you find a great Minolta lens and start to use it you will understand the reason why many of us treasure our old glass. Good luck in your search. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sam_marsh1 Posted September 14, 2007 Share Posted September 14, 2007 If you can cope with slightly less range than that, the Minolta 70-210mm f4 ("Beercan") lens is a cult classic. You'll find people raving about this lens all over the place. As recommended above, have a nose around Dyxum for info. Sam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave_redmann Posted September 14, 2007 Share Posted September 14, 2007 In that price range, would look for a (used) Minolta AF 100-300mm f/4.5-5.6 APO (be sure to get the APO version). Yes, it's a bit shorter than 200-400mm, but you can't have everything. That said, 200-400mm on a 1.53x DSLR gives you the equivalent of a 35mm lens of 306-612mm--definitely not your typical landscape or people focal length range. Are you sure this is what you really want/need? If you have to cover 200-400mm and won't buy a Sigma, the best bet may be the newest version of the Tamron 200-500mm f/5-6.3, which I think is called the SP AF 200-500mm f/5-6.3 Di LD (IF). But B&H shows it at $849 after a mail-in rebate. And of course many people seem to love the "Bigma"--the Sigma 50-500mm f/4-6.3 EX DG, but it's a Sigma and B&H lists it for $999. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave_redmann Posted September 14, 2007 Share Posted September 14, 2007 P.S. Or of course there's the Minolta AF 100-400mm f/4.5-6.7 APO, but it is relatively rare and fairly expensive. And I should point out that there have been lots of other lenses, but none that I've heard enough good things about to recommend (there's been a Tamron 200-400mm, a Sigma 135-400mm, and I'm sure others). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j_kluska Posted September 15, 2007 Author Share Posted September 15, 2007 In may haste to get the thread posted, I neglected to mention that I was intending to work on some nature photography, particularly birds. Now, I realize that birds often necessitate an even longer lens (500mm+)but cost prevemts me from going there; especially if this is a fleeting fancy. The 100-300 range will let me work with people and some nature subjects, particularly at the beach, where I'd like to bring some of the action in. Thanks all, for your input. I may start nosing around the used marked for a beercan. Joe Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave_redmann Posted September 16, 2007 Share Posted September 16, 2007 A few additional thoughts: (1) Maybe buy one of those cheap ($99) 500mm f/8 mirror lenses to play with? Yes, it will be manual focus, but you can get one in the Alpha / Maxxum mount. (2) If you want to shoot birds, even 500mm can be pretty short. I hear that people shooting smaller birds use a telescope and a T-mount adapter. (3) The B&H used department actually has some options for you right now: a Sigma 135-400mm f/4.5-5.6 APO for $379, and a Tamron 200-400mm f/5.6 for $299. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kin_lau Posted September 17, 2007 Share Posted September 17, 2007 If you want to shoot birds, don't want to spend too much, and don't want a Sigma, then I can only think of 2 choices. 1) The Minolta AF 500/8, the only AF mirror lens available. Unfortunately it's hard to find, and often over-priced 2) Tamron AF 200-500. OTOH, if you live in Florida, then a 100-300 will be just fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j_kluska Posted September 17, 2007 Author Share Posted September 17, 2007 Champagne taste on a beer budget....Your posts confirm what I already suspected: I want more than I'm willing to pay for... Alas, what's a cheap cuss like me to do??? My journey continues..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kin_lau Posted September 19, 2007 Share Posted September 19, 2007 In that case, the beercan 70-200 + a manual focus 400/5.6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now