timzeipekis Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 Would it be possible to have a category specifically for B&W for use in critique requests, so that they can be isolated in a search (ratings, critique forum, browsing, etc.)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bobatkins Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 I don't think we want a B&W category, though a check box (similar to the "unmanipulated" check box) would be a possible idea. Of course you'd have to decide if B&W meant shot on B&W film, or shot on color film and desaturated, or digitally captured in B&W or desatured color, plus whether sepia toning counts as B&W etc. etc. While we're at it I suppose a check box for "scanned film" could be added for those who don't like looking at digital captures! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lex_jenkins Posted April 28, 2008 Share Posted April 28, 2008 While I'm a diehard b&w film guy, I'm not sure there's a benefit to such a search category on photo.net. It seems to presume that only a b&w aficionado can appreciate a b&w photo. In my experience, this doesn't seem to be true. And since scanning b&w film and prints is an art and craft unto itself, as evidenced by the many JPEGs of classics I've seen online that don't resemble the actual prints I've seen in museums and galleries, would we be acknowledging the craft of b&w photography, or simply the craft of preparing monochrome JPEGs for web display? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timzeipekis Posted April 29, 2008 Author Share Posted April 29, 2008 It's simply just a way of searching out images that are in B&W on this site, I suppose monotone could be used to include toned images. I just enjoy looking at monotones and was looking for an easier way to view them instead of just browsing blindly. How could that not be a benefit Lex? It doesn't presume anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joshroot Posted April 29, 2008 Share Posted April 29, 2008 A category is not the best way to solve this problem. Moving to a "tagging" based image organization system is the best way. And that is something I am trying to make happen. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
timzeipekis Posted April 29, 2008 Author Share Posted April 29, 2008 Thanks Josh for a straightforward answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now