Jump to content

APS..? yes


stuart_templeton

Recommended Posts

I tripped over last weekend and hit myself in the head with my F-1. I think I must have concussion, because since then I’ve had a desire to shoot some APS – in fact I ordered half a dozen rolls of Kodak Advantix… not something I’ve shot with since 2000.

 

Now I know APS has bad reputation now, and I fully agree with all of it - 35mm and Digital are much better formats. However if you take away the serious photographers and just look at the family happy snappers – it WAS very popular at the time (and cool).

 

I’ll admit that I loved it. My first camera that was actually mine was a Fuji APS model. It went everywhere I did and I shot hundreds of rolls of film through it. I enjoyed every minute of it, and to my teenage mind I had some great pictures to show for it.

 

It gave me my ever-lasting love of photography (what almost killed it was a Pro Photographer friend of my mum’s telling me that I ‘wasn’t a ‘proper’ photographer without an SLR and selling me a Minolta X-300 that I had no idea on how to use – resulting in very poor images and a complete lack of enjoyment - but that's another story).

 

So over the past 15 years of reading about how crap the format was, and seeing how much general hatred it picks up – it surprises me, as that just wasn’t my experience with the format, in fact I still have a B&W image of my wife taken with that camera on my desk.

 

So I thought I’d give it a go again, to experiment and just to see if I’m just looking at it through rose-tinted glasses, and it is crap, or if it is still what I remember – fun. I’ll have a go with my old Fuji camera first – but then I was thinking of getting one of those Canon IX or IX7 SLR’s to see if shooting through a decent lens makes any difference.

 

I’m also wondering on how much I’ve actually improved. Will my knowledge of Composition and exposure and Light etc. – actually result in better images than the one’s I made 20 years ago?

 

Anyway – Just thought I’d share my ramblings – there’s no other point to this other than I’m at work and bored witless.

 

Cheers!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

I never used APS when it was current, but I have to admit that I've looked at the Nikon Pronea 6i more than once and thought about buying it.

 

AFAIK, DX lenses will work fine on it(and most will cover the APS-H frame) and it's AF-S compatible so it could theoretically be a capable of making good use relatively modern lenses.

 

I know there was an adapter for the Coolscan series scanners to scan APS film, although I don't recall if my V can use it. That would make handling the film a lot easier since I know that it's customarily returned in the cartridge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The height of a 35mm frame is 24mm (hence 24x36 frame size) but the actual width of the whole APS film is 24mm. The frame height for APS is 16.7mm.

What really killed my interest in APS was no conventional (silver halide) black & white was ever offered and of course the cartridges were not made to reload (no bulk anyway).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Film height not frame height is the issue for processing reels. Actually, the Canon Elph cameras and their relatively sophisticated features, along with very small size and high quality images were very appealing. Agfa tried the same kind of thing years earlier on and it failed as well -- forgetting history is always a mistake.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand the appeal of shooting some APS. I tried it once, a year before they stopped selling the film. The results were lovely.

 

The trick to appreciating APS is, I think, having the same attitude I have adopted for 35mm. Embrace the grain! Embrace the look of the film stock! The smaller the format, the more intimately you are examining the "canvas" so-to-speak. The texture of the film moves more and more to the foreground.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well-I did it. I bought a Pronea 6i with a 24-70 lens.

 

I seem to recall that the 6i will work with most AI and newer lenses(AF-P and E aperture excepted) so I have a pretty nice complement of good optics to stick in front of it. Of course, most(if not all) DX lenses cover an APS-H and will certainly cover if I want to go to APS-C, so I should be set.

 

Now I just need to dig up some film.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well-I did it. I bought a Pronea 6i with a 24-70 lens.

 

I seem to recall that the 6i will work with most AI and newer lenses(AF-P and E aperture excepted) so I have a pretty nice complement of good optics to stick in front of it. Of course, most(if not all) DX lenses cover an APS-H and will certainly cover if I want to go to APS-C, so I should be set.

 

Now I just need to dig up some film.

 

That's cool - I'll be interested to see the results.

 

I dropped off my first roll for processing today - looking forward to seeing how bad they are :) I can't help thinking I should pick up an SLR too though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I understand the appeal of shooting some APS. I tried it once, a year before they stopped selling the film. The results were lovely.

 

The trick to appreciating APS is, I think, having the same attitude I have adopted for 35mm. Embrace the grain! Embrace the look of the film stock! The smaller the format, the more intimately you are examining the "canvas" so-to-speak. The texture of the film moves more and more to the foreground.

 

That's a really nice way to put it - It's kind of nice to shoot something 'off the wall' for once.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's cool - I'll be interested to see the results.

 

I dropped off my first roll for processing today - looking forward to seeing how bad they are :) I can't help thinking I should pick up an SLR too though.

 

I was in the local camera shop earlier today and the owner gave me a 4-roll pack of Kodak 400 25-exposure((or I should say he threw it in with the Norman kit I bought...which was also priced at a give-away price), so that will be enough to at least scratch the itch.

 

I'll be interested to see other folks' experience, and also to see what I have. I'll probably send it to Dwayne's and get a CD since I dread scanning the stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Honestly, I wouldn't worry about it too much with negative film.

 

Granted therein lies an argument for getting an SLR in your chosen system :) . I think I should be able to dial in +1 EC on the Pronea 6i. I think, but couldn't swear, that it has a manual mode also. I don't know if the Pronea S has EC, and I know it lacks manual.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

R1-08624-0017.thumb.jpg.bdb676f22d3f6b079d8a6ec06cb5d4c2.jpg

 

This is from a compact APS camera that I bought at a thrift store, with unused film already inside. After finishing the roll (and having it sit around a while) I found Walgreens would develop and scan for a reasonable enough price. Many pictures, but not all, have the orange shading, which is either age fog or light leak into the cartridge.

-- glen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When the local camera shop went out of business (sob), they gave me a Nikon Nuvis camera and a roll of Fujifilm APS 200.

 

It's part of my backlog from my long health battles. So if I don't shuffle off this mortal coil, I promise (threaten?) I'll get to it one of these days

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Before the death of APS (assassinated by digital), by pure curiosity, I bought a little Konica and used it a lot with pleasure. Then I found a Canon-IX body, ridiculously cheap, and tried it with my EOS lenses. Of course, I got fair results, and finally adapted also the standard zoom of my Canon 300D to it. Although said to be fit only for the digital sensor of the 300D, it did not vignet with the APS. Here two pictures :

 

the camera with this lens :

 

CanonEOSiX.jpg.aa58f0f94b3f787ac31adba283f12c0f.jpg

 

and an example of the result :

 

LeBoeufSurLeToit.jpg.f62d5d58e5808ce459d410dbc926b54c.jpg

 

Polka

Edited by polka
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
I had a little Canon APS camera for a while, and it was, if nothing else, beautifully made, a solid little brick, and it made decent pictures. What irritated me most about APS was that the supposed advances were either not actually there, or not developed. So for example, the local processors just printed the film without any of the information that was supposedly recorded, and the format differences were not actually format differences on the film. With the electronic operation, it seems silly that panoramic format was still done simply with cropping rather than an actual wider negative. I liked the pocket size of the little Canon, but it wasn't really much smaller than, say, an Olympus Stylus, so without any of the advances actually occurring except for the ability to rewind partway through a roll, it wasn't worth the extra expense of the film.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've run one roll through my Pronea, but haven't had a chance to drop it by the lab(it's not super far away, but far enough that I tend to wait until I have at least a half dozen rolls-I have about that many now, but haven't had the time).

 

In any case, I'll probably opt for just process+scan. I asked about what they could do as far as data on prints, and they told me that they could do things like exposure date if they printed on their Frontier. This lab never makes prints for me, but they also said that they PREFER printing on their Noritsu since "it gives better color" and mostly use the Frontier for scanning but that if I wanted data they'd do it.

 

BTW, mine were all done as APS-H. As I'm sure you all know, APS-C and APS-P are accomplished just by "tagging" the frame with instructions to the printer to only print part of it. I'd rather get all the frame and crop after(and frankly I'd rather start with the ~4:5 a/r of APS-H). The lab did, however, assure me that if they printed the Frontier would print with the tagged crop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...