ola_lagarhus Posted December 6, 2004 Share Posted December 6, 2004 I`ve found some info on the web regarding the American photographer William Mortensen, and it seems like he used only a couple of lights for his portraits. What do you think of this one? http://www.thescreamonline.com/photo/photo06-01/mortensen/americangirl.html His main light for this picture is close to the camera on his left. Do you think he used just one light for this photograph? Well, he must have used gobos and at least one reflector as well. Ola Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rich815 Posted December 6, 2004 Share Posted December 6, 2004 The link is not working, even if I account for the space between 06 and 2001. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seanb Posted December 6, 2004 Share Posted December 6, 2004 Works for me: </P><P> <a href="http://www.thescreamonline.com/photo/photo06-01/mortensen/americangirl.html"> using this link</a> </P><P>More Mortensen images <a href="http://www.thescreamonline.com/photo/photo06-01/mortensen/mortensen_images.html"> here</a>. </P> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maury_cohen Posted December 6, 2004 Share Posted December 6, 2004 He was known for using serious negative retouching to accentuate highlights and shadows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Troll Posted December 7, 2004 Share Posted December 7, 2004 In his hayday Mortensen's teaching was far more influential than Ansel Adams'. He must have been highly respected in '30s Hollywood, but I don't think his "style" would cut it today. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
benjamin_lineberry Posted December 7, 2004 Share Posted December 7, 2004 one light just to the left of the camera (soft, probably an umbrella) on the model, and one light to the right facing the backdrop (not on the model), pulled a little farther back, so that the lighting on the backdrop is almost (but not quite) even. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alan_peck Posted December 7, 2004 Share Posted December 7, 2004 I disagree with Bill to an extent. I think this look is more art than much of the photography I see these days. This look feels a lot closer to illustration and I think this is why it's sucessful. The truth in photography sometimes shortchanges the art. Sometimes it strangles the crap out of it too :) I guess it depends on what you're doing with it, but for portraiture I find it very interesting. Alan in Utah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
allen_friday Posted December 7, 2004 Share Posted December 7, 2004 If you are really interested in Mortensen's lighting methods, check out his book "Pictorial Lighting", 1936. I have a copy on my sshelf at home and it is very interesting. Also, there was an article on Mortensen lighting in Phototechniques a few years ago. You can pick up a copy of his book for $10 at abebooks.com. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
c_p_goerz Posted December 8, 2004 Share Posted December 8, 2004 There is also a section in 'Edge of Darkness' by Barry Thornton devoted to the Mortensen look and how to achieve it. CP Goerz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ola_lagarhus Posted December 8, 2004 Author Share Posted December 8, 2004 Thank you so much for your answers. Well, back to the photograph - I think the main light is above lens axis. And the more I study the light/shade relationships, the more I think of it as a masterpiece. Maury Cohen wrote: `He was known for using serious negative retouching to accentuate highlights and shadows.` Maybe Mortensen used some of his negative retouching here as well...? Ola Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ola_lagarhus Posted April 16, 2006 Author Share Posted April 16, 2006 It`s a long time since "American Girl" by William Mortensen was discussed here. But, someone who learned from Mortensen around 1956/57, told me M. used the `Contour Light` for this one, set up in reverse to the illustration in the book: PICTORIAL LIGHTING (light to the left of the camera). I have the 1947 edition of the book, that also includes this picture. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stuartvail Posted May 6, 2006 Share Posted May 6, 2006 Former Mortensen student Robert Balcomb has an interesting blog for discussing all things Mortensen and anything else you might want to delve into regarding portraiture, techniques, photography as "Art." http://robertbalcombphotoforum.wordpress.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robertbalcomb Posted May 6, 2006 Share Posted May 6, 2006 Mortensen did not retouch negatives. He retouched prints only. I was with him for six months in 1956-57 and am very familiar with his processes and techniques. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now