mingus1 Posted October 6, 2006 Share Posted October 6, 2006 I managed to sell of some of my Leica equipment in order to finance a 6x7camera, now that these have become so cheap I had money to spare and wonderedinto the digital era... perhaps late, but then again better late than never. I spent a complete day at my favorite photo equipement supplier and tested justabout everything he had in stock, from large to small and from cheap to expensive. Obviously I was absolutely flabbergasted by the results and possibilities of thevarious setups. Having shot Leica M's most of my life (still do actually) Iwanted something compact, no DSLR with lot's of lenses and sensor dust andthings, I wanted something basic, simple, luggable and not to visible. On theother hand I wanted to maintain a certain level of quality for some of the shotsI do, not all however, having a 1,5 yr old son you need to be able to make fastshots of which the quality is not all that important, I also needed to be ableto shoot low-light for I do a lot of "life-jazz" photography in B&W mostly,another must have was high quality detail for I also do "doors and doorknobs" aswell as details of architecture. Anyway to cut a very long story short I purchased three digital cameras whichcombined, cover the lot A digital Canon IXUS 800is, for the family shots, small handy, does films andthe pics are of excellent quality fo such a size, and it has image stabilisation Fuji F30 for low-light shote, this is really an excellent low light shooter andsmall enough to always have with you, doesn't have a viewfinder though which wilrequire some practice, but I am really amazed by the low-light quality of thismodel, 1600 asa is not a problem, and the grain, digitalis call it noise, isbeautiful in the B&W mode And last but not least a Sony R-1 for detail. I know this might be an overkill, but each of the above stated cameras has it'squalities, and all in all all three together are cheaper than any of my leicalenses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karim Ghantous Posted October 7, 2006 Share Posted October 7, 2006 Not a bad idea to have one camera for each specific situation. The R-1 is fine but maybe a Pentax DSLR might have also been suitable (and you get interchangable lenses). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robert lee Posted October 9, 2006 Share Posted October 9, 2006 "I wanted something compact, ... maintain a certain level of quality ... shoot low-light ... having a 1,5 yr old son..." Have you take a look at the Canon XTi/400D? Weld the 17-55 f2.8 EFS in front and you're done (or use the 35mm f2.0 for something even more compact and less expensive.) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now