dan_k6 Posted January 26, 2008 Share Posted January 26, 2008 I currently use the Impact brand of NiMH AA's that B&H sells. They come with a sleek cordless wall charger. The problem is they take forever to charge. I would estimate minimum 4 hours. Also there are times when the batteries just sit around because I am not using the flash and they gradually lose their charge. I just checked out this company called MahaEnergy. They make some nifty batteries and chargers. They have this brand of battery called IMEDION. It is rated at only 2100 mAh though. The cool thing about this battery is that is doesn't lose it's charge. They claim that it may lose 5% over the period of 1 year. This sounds great. I might pick a few pairs up as well as their 1 hour charger. My question is...Am I going to notice anything with 2100 mAh versus what I use now at 2700 mAh? I certainly appreciate the convenience of these IMEDION's but I don't want to sacrifice a considerable amount of power. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Two23 Posted January 26, 2008 Share Posted January 26, 2008 I've been using the Kodak 2500 mAh batteries bought at Walmart for $7.44. I have 9 SB flash units so battery cost and performance is important to me. Four hour recharge sounds a little long for a 2100 mAh battery. My Kodak 1-hour charger takes about 2.5 hours to charge the 2500 capacity. From what I've heard, you really don't want to be using the fast chargers because they shorten battery life. I've been very happy with the Kodak batteries, especially the cost. They've been flawless even sitting out in 25 below zero cold for two hours. I'm no expert, but if the Imedions are NiMH batteries, why would they really be any better about keeping a charge? I doubt you'd notice anything different about a 2100, 2500, or 2700. Note that there is some varience how companies rate them anyway. I have looked at the MAHA batteries and decided for myself it's not worth a switch. The Kodak 2500 batteries I use have had enough stamina and have been 100% reliable so far. All the other brands I've looked at are NiMH and I just don't see how they'd be any better. As for chargers, I'm sticking with the mid-speed ones since I don't really need a fast one, and am afraid the really fast ones are hard on the batteries. I have 36 of the Kodak 2500, so that's a fair investment there. I use the SB flash units to take photos of moving trains, at night. I live and travel in a very cold place so you can bet I put quite a bit of strain on my batteries. Kent in SD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Ingold Posted January 26, 2008 Share Posted January 26, 2008 There's not enough difference between 2100 mAH and 2700 mAH to be concerned about. If the self-discharge rate is as low as claimed, you won't have to charge everything the night before. While you're there, checkout the 8-bay Maha chargers. Each battery is charged individually. They're expensive but worth every penny. A regular charger stops when the first battery is done, leaving any low batteries partially charged. They charge in an hour - or two hours on "slow" charge. Those cheap wall warts take overnight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan_k6 Posted January 26, 2008 Author Share Posted January 26, 2008 Thanks Kent and Edward. Edward, should I be concerned about the advertised self-discharge rate of the IMEDION's. There's nothing like having fresh batteries when you need them right away. I am definitely going to pick up that 8 bay charger. I didn't know that conventional chargers stop after the first battery has been fully charged. That's scary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Two23 Posted January 26, 2008 Share Posted January 26, 2008 I certainly don't charge my Kodak 2500 mAh batteries the day before, or even the week before. I know some hadn't been charged in a month, and yet they worked perfectly at 25 below zero. You'd think if there was a problem, it would have shown up then for sure! Kent in SD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ed_Ingold Posted January 26, 2008 Share Posted January 26, 2008 Most chargers handle batteries in pairs, but it's impossible to know which are which. Now that I have the Maha charger I find that at least some batteries tend to be significantly lower that the others. I had trouble with long recycle times, even using a Quantum Turbo. I no longer have a problem now that the batteries are equalized. It's a good idea to top off all your batteries before a big job. Ordinary NiMH batteries lose at about 15% of their charge a week. In any event, the higher the retained charge, the less time it takes to top them off. It's better to be safe than to make excuses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JosvanEekelen Posted January 26, 2008 Share Posted January 26, 2008 There are NiMH batteries available with a very low discharge rate. Sanyo's Eneloop is just one type, others who claim similar specifications are around as well. I don't know the full details, but I have the impression that the improved performance they offer - mainly the low self discharge rate - is obtained by using better raw materials than in ordinary NiMHs. They are more expensive than regular ones, the choice whether the improved performance is worth the higher price is yours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
russ_konrad Posted January 26, 2008 Share Posted January 26, 2008 You can get away with not charging your batteries right before a job if you are only going to take a few shots - but if you have to shoot an entire wedding (8-10 hours) or equivalent - you better charge them the night before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Two23 Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 Edward-- Thanks for the info. While I'm not yet sold on the low discharge batteries since I haven't had issues, I am sold on that 8-slot Maha recharger. With something like that it would be easy to keep my batteries up and running. I don't do any 8 hour marathons so just charging once a month would probably get me by. When they come out with higher capacity low discharge batteries I will likely spring for some. I've found that the higher mAh ratings seem to cope better with the below zero temps for me. That's not a factor for someone shooting weddings, of course. Kent in SD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pete_s. Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 mAh ratings are usually done at a very low current draw meaning the batteries will only have the rated capacity when discharged very, very slow. In a flash they are discharged rather fast. The only way to compare two different batterie types is to use them and see how much difference there is. For instance on a fully charged set count how many full pops you can get before the recycling time goes over whatever you can accept. There is no way to know the outcome. The lower rated batteries may have more capacity then the higher ones or it may be the total opposite. Peter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robert_martin5 Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 I have started using Rayovac HYBIRD rechargable NiMH batteries in my SB-800. These hold their charge for a long time and do not require charging before you use them. They are available at WalMart - just make sure the word "HYBIRD" is on the battery since the normal NiHM look similar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
g._v. Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 Will Crockett has tested a lot of different batteries/chargers and his recommendations can be found here: http://www.shootsmarter.com/index.php? option=com_content&task=view&id=162. He favors batteries and chargers from Maha and Ansmann. Shootsmarter readers can get a 5% discount from Thomas-Distributing by using this link: http://www.thomas-distributing.com/shootsmarter/index.htm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dan_k6 Posted January 27, 2008 Author Share Posted January 27, 2008 G.V., Thanks for that link. I just saved $5.00! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now