rod_larson Posted June 24, 2013 Share Posted June 24, 2013 <p>The old saying goes "idle hands are the devil's playground" and when my hands are idle they like to walk<br> through the big auction site but one idle day I spotted this Kodak Medalist II described as having been<br> used right up until the time the shutter started to fail. It had a buy it now price that was well below the<br> average completed auction price so I went for it. When it arrived the shutter blades were covered with<br> oil and when it was stripped down it was pretty evident that everything was covered with 60 years of<br> grease and grime so a total cleaning was in order. When that was done the Medalist was ready for action.</p> <p>The Kodak Medlist II was based on the Medalist of WWII fame and went on the market after the war. It<br> sports Kodak's famous Ektar lens, which some say is the best lens ever made. For the Medalist II it is the<br> 3.5/100 version. Whats unusual about the Medalists is the collapsable lens barrel. Turning the large knurled<br> ring moves the barrel in and out and also serves as the focusing ring. The camera uses 620 film and there<br> is a service that will modify the camera for 120 film but I find it very easy to just wind 120 onto a 620<br> spool.</p> <p>There is a ton of info on the net about the Medalist series of cameras so I won't bore anyone with what<br> has already been said and instead flash some camera porn.</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rod_larson Posted June 24, 2013 Author Share Posted June 24, 2013 <p>Here is a topview. You can see the frame counter on the left. Loading a new roll of film is an<br> exact process in order to get frame counter to read correctly. By the way, this is a 6x9<br> camera so you get 8 exposures per roll.</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rod_larson Posted June 24, 2013 Author Share Posted June 24, 2013 <p>This is what the camera looks like with the lens tube collapsed.</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rod_larson Posted June 24, 2013 Author Share Posted June 24, 2013 <p>On cold day last October i took it to a bridge opening. A band led the way across the bridge.</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rod_larson Posted June 24, 2013 Author Share Posted June 24, 2013 <p>Of course there was much speechifying by the politicians who all took credit for building the<br> bridge.</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rod_larson Posted June 24, 2013 Author Share Posted June 24, 2013 <p>The arches of the new bridge have an LED lighting system. On special occasions it can be<br> programmed to put on quite a light show. Have to get down there sometime at night and<br> try to get a photo.</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Gammill Posted June 24, 2013 Share Posted June 24, 2013 Very nice. 6x9 negatives where big enough that budget-conscious photographers could get inexpensive contact prints which were fine for photo albums. Of course if one could afford a Medalist then a few more cents to enlarge probably wasn't an issue. Great results, btw. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rod_larson Posted June 24, 2013 Author Share Posted June 24, 2013 <p>After the ribbon cutting pedestrians could stroll on the bridge the rest of the day. One of<br> the photographers covering the event came over to me and said he had never seen a camera<br> like mine before and asked if he could take a picture of it. Being the modest person I am I<br> let him.</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tony_lockerbie Posted June 24, 2013 Share Posted June 24, 2013 <p>Love that camera! The top view is very elegant and the Ektar is a top class lens for sure and obviously does color well too.<br> That is quite a beautiful bridge as well, no doubt that politicians do a good job of bridge building :)<br> The Medalist is right at the top of my must-have -one list! </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rick_drawbridge Posted June 24, 2013 Share Posted June 24, 2013 <p>Now <em>that's</em> what I call a camera, very rare in my part of the planet, and very well-pursued on the auction sites. It's interesting to see how it borrowed quite a few construction details, knobs, etc. from the original Kodak 35 rangefinder of which I have a couple; both models share that sort of "built from spare parts" look, though the Medalist is somewhat more handsome. Fairly typical of the no-nonsense, sturdy US design of the era. Your example looks super-tidy, <strong>Rod</strong>; please post some more images from the camera when you get the chance.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_shriver Posted June 24, 2013 Share Posted June 24, 2013 <p>This is another camera/lens known as "Big Bertha". The Beseler Topcon Super D with the R. Topcor 30cm 1:2.8 lens. Close to 10 pounds of optical excellence.</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDMvW Posted June 24, 2013 Share Posted June 24, 2013 <p>Fascinating.</p> <p>Thanks for showing it off.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tony_lockerbie Posted June 24, 2013 Share Posted June 24, 2013 <p>Now that's an impressive lens...the camera behind is pretty cool too.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_mareno1 Posted June 24, 2013 Share Posted June 24, 2013 <p>Probably the only camera that I've always wanted but never bought. The pics from these seem really, really good, but the camera's odd shape and ergonomics were just too much for me to overcome. You have a beauty there.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lou_Meluso Posted June 24, 2013 Share Posted June 24, 2013 <p>Nice job, Rod. I always like the looks of the Medalist. Nice lens that Ektar. Heavy mug, though.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rod_larson Posted June 25, 2013 Author Share Posted June 25, 2013 <p>John, lugging that ten pounds around all day should make your biceps bulge. I had to<br> chuckle at the picture of the lens mounted on the tripod because I can remember way back<br> when being told not to hold the camera by the lens because it could damage the mount but<br> with a lens that big well.........</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick_van_Nooij Posted June 25, 2013 Share Posted June 25, 2013 <p>The 100mm f/3.5 Ektar on the Medalists has an additional lens element compared to the other Ektar lenses. I'm pretty sure Kodak constructed it from pure magic.<br> The Ektar on the Medalist had internally coated lens elements, the Medalist II has Kodak's improved single hard coating. <br> The Medalist is an over-engineered beast like the Ektra, but way more reliable ;) </p> <p> </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dinis_leal Posted June 25, 2013 Share Posted June 25, 2013 <p>Hi Rod, was the shutter easily accessible atfer removing the front element? I have a Medalist 1 with a shutter that needs cleaning...</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rod_larson Posted June 25, 2013 Author Share Posted June 25, 2013 <p>Dinis - It is pretty easy to take apart. The photo shows the assembly with the front element<br> removed.</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rod_larson Posted June 25, 2013 Author Share Posted June 25, 2013 <p>Remove the three screws in the above photo. Once they are removed you can remove the<br> front covers and then remove the two screws by the red arrows.</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rod_larson Posted June 25, 2013 Author Share Posted June 25, 2013 <p>Remove the aperture ring and the flash cocking ring.</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rod_larson Posted June 25, 2013 Author Share Posted June 25, 2013 <p>If I remeber correctly remove tha two marked screws and another but I don't remember<br> which one.</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rod_larson Posted June 25, 2013 Author Share Posted June 25, 2013 <p>You now have access to the shutter components.</p><div></div> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dinis_leal Posted June 26, 2013 Share Posted June 26, 2013 <p>Rod, thanks for the instructions and exellent photos. That is very helpful.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_shriver Posted June 26, 2013 Share Posted June 26, 2013 <p>Looking at the internals of a Kodak shutter is always cool. Supermatics and Kodamatics are just tanks, but they are so humble on the inside. They were amazingly able to build solid and reliable shutters out of stamped steel parts that looked like they came from a Big Ben alarm clock. Value engineering in the best way! <br> I've never had any problem getting a Kodak shutter working again.<br> This is the exact opposite of German leaf shutters, of course. The Japanese hit a middle ground.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now