john_mcdonald Posted May 4, 2002 Share Posted May 4, 2002 I am just delving into 8x10, and looking for a good moderate wide angle. Does anyone have information or experience with the 9-1/2" f6.8 Dagor, in regards to image quality and coverage? Or perhaps a more suitable recommendation? Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
erik_ryberg Posted May 4, 2002 Share Posted May 4, 2002 The 9.5 inch will offer modest room for movement. Some have saidthere is a slight focus shift from 6.8 to 22. Contrast is good for aclassic lens as there are only four air-glass surfaces, and theselenses are very sharp. It will be more than suitable for contactprinting. <p> My advice is to make sure it is in a good shutter if this is yourfirst experience with large format; you don't want to waste a lot offilm getting to know a finnicky shutter when you are just learning. If you already use a large format camera, then you already know whatyou are willing to put up with. Also, if you intend to use filters,consider how you are going to do that with this lens. For $75 SteveGrimes will make you an adaptor to take modern filters. It's kind ofpricey but I bought one and love it. I can now put filters and even alens shade on an old Artar I have. <p> I ended up selling my 9 1/2" dagor because I got a modern lens in thatfocal length, but it was an outstanding lens. I still use the 7 inchdagor on 8x10 often. It just barely covers the format at infinity,with some fairly noticeable image degradation in the corners. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_kasaian2 Posted May 4, 2002 Share Posted May 4, 2002 John, How much do you want to spend? Robert White has(last time I looked)excellent deals on recently discontinued G-Clarons, 240mm 270mm and 305mm in new copal shutters. When the price of new stuff(excellent new stuff) approaches the price of really old stuff it is certainly worth considering. Dagors have excellent reputations of course, but take a look at Robert White too. Cheers! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_hicks___ Posted May 5, 2002 Share Posted May 5, 2002 > recently discontinued G-Clarons, <p> Discontinued? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
john_kasaian2 Posted May 5, 2002 Share Posted May 5, 2002 Discontinued! Thats the word. By the time I'll be able to afford a new lens they'll probably be long gone and the used ones will have achieved cult status. I think Badger Graphic was dealing on G- Clarons as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_goldfarb Posted May 5, 2002 Share Posted May 5, 2002 The Dagors are nice lenses. I have a 168mm Ser. III, which just covers 8x10", an 8-1/4" Gold Dot in barrel, which covers with a little movement and is soon to be shutter mounted, and a 12" Gold Dot in barrel, which covers with plenty of room for movements and which I use on the front of an Ilex #5 shutter. They are compact in design and very sharp with good contrast and smooth tonality. <p> In the range you are considering, I use a 10" Wide-Field Ektar, which has a huge image circle. It's not as snappy as the Dagors, but it does offer huge coverage. I suspect the two facts may be related--huge coverage resulting in more light bouncing around inside the bellows, so I'm building a compendium shade for use with my camera which should improve contrast with this and other lenses. <p> Here's a suburban landscape in B&W with the 12" GD Dagor: <p> http://www.photo.net/photo/496688&size=lg <p> and here's a color portrait with the same lens. I included some details under the main image, but the scans aren't really as sharp as the original chrome under a loupe: <p> http://www.photo.net/photo/524513&size=lg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now