lars ake vinberg Posted August 31, 2003 Share Posted August 31, 2003 Not really a question, but I came up with a really neat way to modify the Manfrotto 359 Long Lens Support. What I did not like about the Manfrotto product is that it uses the Super Clamp, which is quite heavy at 450 grams (1 lb) and in this case an overkill by far, all the support needs to do is dampen vibrations. I replaced the Super Clamp with a plastic carpenter's clamp, attached using a hose clamp only. The hose clamp is tightened to avoid any play while still allowing rotation. The resulting assembly weighs only 335 grams (11.5 oz), a weight savings by 400 grams, and is quite adequate for field use with my 480 mm lens at 25" extension. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lars ake vinberg Posted August 31, 2003 Author Share Posted August 31, 2003 Closeup of clamp modification. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james_nasuta Posted August 31, 2003 Share Posted August 31, 2003 It's a nice idea but I wonder if the weight savigs of 65 grams (400 - 335 = 65) is significant when you are willing to burden yourself with a nonstrrous 8X10 ssetup? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james_nasuta Posted August 31, 2003 Share Posted August 31, 2003 Sorry, I should have checked my figures before posting. The weight savings should be 450 - 335 = 115 grams. Still a reletively a small amount compared to the weight of an 8x10, but then perhaps with such a burden ANY weight saving is considered significant! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lars ake vinberg Posted August 31, 2003 Author Share Posted August 31, 2003 OK, let's try this again... the original assembly including the heavy Super Clamp weighs 735 grams, the modified assembly weighs 335 grams, a reduciton of 400 grams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
james_nasuta Posted August 31, 2003 Share Posted August 31, 2003 Thanks for the update. I was not aware of the true original weight. The weight savings, and it's significance, makes much more sense now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
younghoon_kil Posted September 3, 2003 Share Posted September 3, 2003 Hello, My equipments are not so different with yours, and I'm just thinking about long lens support. I want to purchase 'same' parts via internet, which you used in modifying long lens support. (and I'm in Korea) Please give me information. Can it be used with Ries' wood tripod? Also, can I exchange ball head from long lens support to other products? Thank you for all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lars ake vinberg Posted September 3, 2003 Author Share Posted September 3, 2003 younghoon KIL - The original assembly is called Manfrotto 359 Long Lens Support in Europe. The American importer Bogen uses different product numbers - see the Manfrotto website. The 359 consists of three parts: 1. An extendable rod with a 3/8" thread at one end and a 5/8"standard attachment for lighting supports at the other end 2. A tiny ballhead with 1/4" screw to the camera side and 3/8" socket to attach to the rod. 3. A Manfrotto Super Clamp - see the Manfrotto website. The Super clamp is the heavy part. As you can see in my photos, I purchased two parts to replace the Super Clamp. I went to a well equipped hardware store, bought one stainless steel hose clamp and one carpenter's clamp normally used for fixing when glueing pieces of wood. To find the proper carpenter's clamp I took the rod with me to the hardware store to try different clamps. The one I bought is quite small, does not open more than perhaps 40 mm but that is enough to grab one of my tripod legs. With a wooden tripod it might be different so you have to try the clamp before buying. When you tighten the stainless hose clamp you must not tighten it too much, as the clamp must be able to rotate to allow for different angles and focusing. I also made a small modification to my camera by adding a 1/4" thread below the front standard. For this I used a 3/8"-1/4" reduction thread, drilled a 9 mm hole through the front board, and glued the thread in place using wood glue. Remember that this rod is only for stabilizing, not for supporting the camera. So even after my modifications it is still overdimensioned. I hope this helps. If you need more detailed information then email me privately and I will send you some more closeup photos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charlie_goodwin Posted September 9, 2004 Share Posted September 9, 2004 Check out this interesting alternative at a very good site: www.naturfotograf.com/sacht3.html C Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now