Jump to content

35mm Reloadable cassettes. . Metal vrs Plastic


Recommended Posts

Hello everyone. It has been ages since "rolling my own" but now the desire is back. Could anyone give me some idea how the "plastic" cassettes fare vrs the metal ones? My major concerns are 1. Felt 2. Security of the cap & 3. Long term usage (number of loads until???). Aloha, Bill
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Used both. Preferred the metal, though in a particular moment of clumsiness, I dropped one long end down and it popped the cap -- suspect it might have been a bit tired from use. Either will work for a long time. I have a special gadget that easily and harmlessly opens the metal ones in the dark, so that is a factor in my preference. Key point is to store where they won't gather dust and keep them in the cans when loaded -- exposed or unexposed. Inspect, Vacuum the light trap and discard at the first sign of a problem. They're cheap enough even now.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just bought a set of 5 new plastic ones to augment the ones I have, they seem to work fine for me...I pretty much made the switch to plastic about 5 years ago when my metal ones were becoming less reliable.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think I'd bother with re-using commercial cassettes, Bill. I use both metal ones with the clip-on ends, and the Kaiser/Arista screw-on plastic cassettes. I tend to trust the metal ones more than the plastic, but I've never had either pop open, though I suspect the metal ones would have a better chance of surviving being dropped. It pays to keep an eye on the felt, and when it starts to fray, discard the cassette. You can pay a lot of money for Nikon/Pentax reloadables, but I've never really been tempted.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My first roll of 35mm film, I got when I was nine years old, 50 years ago, visiting Seattle. It was bulk loaded by a Seattle photography store, in a reusable cartridge. I saved that one (not for any reason), and when I started bulk loading a year later (after inheriting some bulk film from my grandfather) that was one that I used.

 

I still have that one, and now live in Seattle, but the store isn't there anymore.

 

Otherwise, I have used Kodak Snap-Cap cartridges over the years, but less often plastic ones.

 

I try to keep them clean, but have never tried to check them, or clean them, otherwise.

 

For newer cameras, you want ones with DX coding on them. That usually means metal.

-- glen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both plastic and metal cassettes come in good and bad quality. One could buy plastic cassettes from the Californai outfits in lots of 25. The felt is not a problem; it stays well for a long time. The cap thread may become loose after long use, like two years etc. To be on the safe side one could use paper tape on the cap to secure it doubly. Some of the best metal cassettes were made by the Soviets for FED cameras. They did not need even felt lining. They have press button locks after the twist. But they are very expensive. Good luck. SP.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Re DX coding. A lot of the better cameras, when DX coding was introduced, provided an override for manually setting the ISO, I remember my Contax RX did. So using coded cassettes basically was irrelevant for me. These days most of my film work is with old Leicas, so it doesn't matter whether the cassettes are coded or not, as there is no metering in the cameras.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Isn't JDMvW's portrait fantastic. You have to watch that the plastic ones cap twists off dead easy, put me off forever. & you need the proper tool to take the cap of the metal one. Not quite necessary but I was constantly batch processing as an assistant. U.K., suppliers, havn't checked but perhaps Speedgraphic, & Silverprint.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello again everyone. Mahalo again. I am taking the "odd duck" way out & have ordered (5) each of the metal and plastic. I will keep track of each & see how they hold up. Ages ago the metal cassettes I was using only gave me trouble with the felt catching junk & scratching the negs. Washing them with dish detergent solved that problem, but they all went up in smoke with the fire in 15.

I think JD's "classy" avatar picture is from his FSU passport when he was running the Fed plant in the Ukraine. Aloha, Bill

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well I received the cartridges and loader and decided to order the Kentmere 100 as it is cheaper than the Delta 100, I figured I better start on a less expensive roll just in case I muck it up, don't want to lose a 70.00 roll of film

I will let you know how it goes.

Don

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello everyone. Don I think you will find the Kentmere 100 an excellent film. IMHO (& others) this is the same film as my Ultrafine Xtreme 100, and others are reporting that it is appearing as other emulsion. Regardless of name, I find it a bit different than Ilford or Kodak cubic grain emulsions, but fully capable of fine grain & larger than normal (8x10) prints. With 100' in hand, you can "experiment" & zero the film with whatever developer you wish. Here, Obsidian Aqua or PyrocatHD work wonders. Aloha, Bill
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...