Jump to content

20D Naming Files _MG_... not IMG_... Why?


jona h

Recommended Posts

Adam,

 

Call 1 800 OK CANON and ask them. Nobody here knows why Canon chose to name their files as they did. And no photographer should care, frankly. It's entirely arbitrary. Surely you'll be renaming your files, right? So what difference does it make what name the file has right out of the camera? It could be called osriutyf.bla for all you'd care, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The "_" at the start of images shot in Adobe 1998 complies with DCF and EXIF data standards - all cameras are supposed to do this. My Sony R1 does, too. Standards were established by JEITA (Japanese Electronics Industry Trade Assoc.) - so don't blame Canon.

 

If you want you can read the (yawn!) 154-page pdfs defining the standards for EXIF (image file format and naming conventions) and DCF (the standard for organizing the image files on the flash memory) - here:

 

http://www.exif.org/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...

hahaha i was just wondering whats wrong with my camera when i googled and found this thread.

 

is it better to shoot in SRGB, or Adobe (1998)?

 

definitely for post processing, i use adobe(1998) or even ProPhoto in 12 bits, but i'm not sure for the shooting colour space. Anyone?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...