Jump to content

20D and IR Photography


toddklassy

Recommended Posts

This is probably a stupid question, but I need to ask it nonetheless.

 

To take digital infrared photos with a 20D all I need is a IR filter

(i.e. Hoya RM-72), correct? I aimed my IR remote control at my 20D

and the 20D picked up the IR beam.

 

Will the 20D take average to above average IR photos?

 

Thanks,

 

Todd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought all digital cameras could take IR images to one degree or another. And there's a guy on Flickr who is taking nice IR photos with a so-called modified Canon 20D. I don't know what he means by "modified," but I would sure like to know.

 

You can find his images at:

 

J Michael Sullivan

 

Todd

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<p>If the IR cutoff filter of the 20D is like the one in the 300D (which I suspect is true), then you *can* take IR pics.

</p>

The problem is, you need really really long exposures to compensate for the IR filter.</p>

<p>

This is a shot I took with the 50 1.8, using an RM100 filter, f/8 20 seconds on a sunny day!</p>

<img src="http://d6d2h4gfvy8t8.cloudfront.net/1858422-lg.jpg">

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can just about do IR on a standard 20D but its hard work and not very satisfactory. Problem is that all current digital cameras have an IR blocking filter in front of the sensor. Cheapest entry level solution is to buy a used Olympus C2020-Z which is very IR sensitive (no blocking filter) and put an IR pass filter R72 or equivalent on the lens. In reasonably good daylight you can then actually handhold and get good IR images (all be it a 2MP).

<p>

For a high quality IR solution you need to have the IR blocking filter removed on your camera. There are companies that advertise new EOS 350D's (DRebel XT)with this change made.

<p>

I took a slightly different approach - I bought a used D60 (a very underrated camera in my mind) and had the IR blocking filter over the sensor replaced with an IR pass filter (R72 equiv). This means I have a permanent IR camera which I can hand hold and I can use the viewfinder (since I don't need the visible light opaque R72 filter on the lens itself). The UK based guy that did the conversion for me also adjusts the focusing parameters to correct for IR wavelegths.<div>00DTar-25551484.jpg.47fa546365de481265d6eb0749a7dd29.jpg</div>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi there,

I shoot digital infrared photography using a 300D and I have friends who shoot it with a 20D as well. The 20D is capable of shooting IR photos but the exposure time is long, you must use a tripod. <br>

Also, not all Canon lenses are good for IR photography... the list below is taken from the IR section from Clubsnap but hope it helps.

<p>

It shows which of the Canon lens are good or bad for IR photography :

<P>

Good<br>

Canon EF 17-40mm f/4 L<br>

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8 L<br>

Canon EF 28-135mm f/3.5-5.6 IS<br>

Canon EF 28mm f/2.8<br>

Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 MKI<br>

Canon EF 50mm f/1.8 MKII<br>

Canon EF 70-200mm f/4L<br>

Canon EF 75-300mm f/4.0-5.6 IS<br>

Canon EF 135mm f/2L<br>

Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.0-5.6 IS L<br>

Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 macro<br>

Canon EF 28mm f/1.8 USM<br>

Sigma AF 15mm f/2.8 EX Fisheye<br>

<p>

Bad<br>

Canon EF 16-35mm f2.8 L<br>

Canon EF 20mm f/2.8<br>

Canon EF 35mm f/2<br>

Canon EF 24-85mm f/3.5-4.5<br>

Canon EF 28-70mm f/2.8L<br>

Canon EF 28-105mm f/3.5-4.5<br>

Canon EF 35-80 f/4.0-5.6<br>

Canon EF 50mm f/1.4<br>

Canon EF 50mm f/2.5 Macro<br>

Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS<br>

Canon EF 85mm f/1.8<br>

Tamron 70-300mm f3.x-xxx Macro<br>

Sigma 20mm f/1.8<br>

Sigma 50-500mm "Bigma"<br>

Tamron 19-35mm<br>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...