edward_h Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 After my focus ring problem I've found that the front part of the lensis becoming really loose. So I went to the repair shop and gave themthe 16-35 with the invoice. It's a two month old glass and so's I figured it would be a warrantyrepair. Yeah right. The first thing out of their mouths was "it'sprobably been dropped". And that irritates me, because by saying that it's drop damage theycan charge pretty much whatever they want and if I don't want to payfor the repairs they STILL charge 40$ just for looking at it. Jesus, I'm SO tired of my stuff breaking all the time. I'm thinkingthat I'll just keep using my remaining equipment until it all breaksand when it's done and broken I'll quit the photography business. Shit I might even start a camera repair business. It sure seemsprofitable: even if the camera is one day old you can just say "dropdamage" and charge what you want and it guarantees you at least 40$... I'm beginning to hate cameras as much as I hate computers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charles_stobbs3 Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 Back to the pinhole camera and the sliderule. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mike_elek Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 Many of the cameras are computer-like devices. Go all manual -- then it just needs to be serviced every couple of decades. Also, watch the language. Moderators have mentioned in the past that very little tolerance will be shown for rough language. The most troublesome part of mass production is inconsistent quality. I think that manufacturers make random checks but not every lens is tested. There are only a few photographic lenses today that undergo individual inspection at every step, and even those suffer breakdowns and problems. So hopefully you just got a bad sample. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
digitmstr Posted June 29, 2005 Share Posted June 29, 2005 All of my dealings with Canon USA (in Irvine, CA) have been first rate. It sounds very strange that they wouldn't fix a 16-35 and claim user damage instead. Have you complained? You should have. I know I would have, had they falsely claimed I did something to the lens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now