AJG Posted December 4, 2015 Share Posted December 4, 2015 <p>Has anybody used one of these? I don't really care about the macro feature of this lens, but the shift function would be of interest if the optical quality is decent. There are mixed reviews on B&H for this lens in Canon and Nikon mounts, but no reviews for the Pentax mount version. I know it is a totally manual lens, and for architectural work that wouldn't bother me at all--I'm used to working with a 4x5.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ukhov Posted December 4, 2015 Share Posted December 4, 2015 <p>-thing like micro vs shift to what is function ?</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AJG Posted December 4, 2015 Author Share Posted December 4, 2015 <p>Shift is the equivalent of rising/falling front on a view camera. I'm just curious about the optical quality of the lens.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stemked Posted December 6, 2015 Share Posted December 6, 2015 <p>I've been looking at the lens too, but mostly for its macro ability. Here's a review on Facebook:<br /> http://petapixel.com/2015/06/29/review-the-venus-optics-laowa-15mm-f4-11-wide-angle-macro-lens/</p> <p>Not sure if its still good but there is a code for a discount for the lens.</p> This is pinched from the review: Conclusion Pros – Able to focus from 1:1 to infinity without extension tubes – Excellent image quality – Well controlled diffraction up to f/22 – Small and light for an ultra-wide angle – Lens shift for subjects above eye level – Affordable price Cons – No automatic aperture control – Chromatic aberration at the corners – Large lens diameter, challenging to approach and illuminate subjects – Obvious barrel distortion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hjoseph7 Posted December 13, 2015 Share Posted December 13, 2015 <p>How close do you have to be to the subject for Macro work ? </p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stemked Posted December 14, 2015 Share Posted December 14, 2015 <p>Harry,</p> <p>I think the answer is (unscientifically) 'VERY' close.</p> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now