eos 10 fan Posted August 20, 2007 Share Posted August 20, 2007 http://www.usa.canon.com/consumer/controller?act=ModelInfoAct&fcategoryid=148&modelid=15670 -- Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freelance Posted August 20, 2007 Share Posted August 20, 2007 I suppose that this lens should be recommended specially for FF cameras. In bodies with crop factor the 10-22 should be the best option, isn`t? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chrisjb Posted August 20, 2007 Share Posted August 20, 2007 Wow.:) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yakim_peled1 Posted August 20, 2007 Share Posted August 20, 2007 Assuming it is a real improvement of the last model, this will be a dream UWA lens. Judging from the recent future i.e. 16-35/2.8 II and 85/1.2 II, I tend to suspect it will. Happy shooting, Yakim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marc_bergman1 Posted August 20, 2007 Share Posted August 20, 2007 Why do they call it an Ultra-Wide Angle Zoom? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wildpicture Posted August 20, 2007 Share Posted August 20, 2007 "I suppose that this lens should be recommended specially for FF cameras. In bodies with crop factor the 10-22 should be the best option, isn`t?" You can't really compare these lenses. The 14mm is a very fast prime lens about three times the price of the much slower 10-22 zoom lens. Of course the extreme wide angle of the 14mm is designed for FF. However I do use my 14/2.8 (a much less expensive Sigma) regularly on my 1D2 body as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim_larson1 Posted August 20, 2007 Share Posted August 20, 2007 I am honestly not sure WHAT is the point of this lens. What was wrong with the 14/2.8L-I? Not enough profit, so re-release with an increased price? I guess a 10/2.8L would have required too much engineering? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave_lewis Posted August 20, 2007 Share Posted August 20, 2007 And with the $2200 price tag that Amazon had the other day, it's a bit too pricey. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yakim_peled1 Posted August 21, 2007 Share Posted August 21, 2007 >> What was wrong with the 14/2.8L-I? http://www.fredmiranda.com/reviews/showproduct.php?product=27&sort=7&cat=2&page=1 Happy shooting, Yakim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
anson_ko Posted August 21, 2007 Share Posted August 21, 2007 weather sealed, lead free glass? shaper, better resolution? Well, one thing for sure is better to have more choices/updates than none. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now