roger c Posted September 10, 2003 Share Posted September 10, 2003 Nothing to do with Leicas, unless you have one of those very rare LTMs that shoots stereo pairs, but <a href="http://www.well.com/user/jimg/stereo/stereo_list.html">this</a> is fascinating and so simple it's unbelievable. I got the link from b3ta.com (don't go there unless you're hardened to serious Photoshop abuse). Oh yeah, some nudity but it's artistic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg_smith4 Posted September 10, 2003 Share Posted September 10, 2003 Neat..but they kind of make me dizzy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
greg_erker Posted September 11, 2003 Share Posted September 11, 2003 Cool. Reminds me of holding a hologram in your hand and rotating it back and forth. <p> I've hard about this before and one use was for showing 3d images to people who have no stereo vision. <p> I don't think it will replace medium format 3d for me, or even the lowly Realist (which has a much longer rangefinder baseline than Leica's, to try to make this on topic a bit :-) <p> Greg E. <p> <a href ="http://www.angelfire.com/ca/erker">My 3d page</a> Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karim Ghantous Posted September 11, 2003 Share Posted September 11, 2003 That's really cool. Wish I'd thought of that. But the best way to enjoy naturalistic '3D' images involves nothing special at all. I've discovered (*this* idea is *mine*! ;-)) that closing one eye when viewing a 2D image makes it feel 3D in a subtle way. Maybe that's because the brain can't tell the difference between a 3D scene and a 2D scene with the information from only one eye, so everything therefore is real or solid. Try watching movies on the big screen this way. This technique works better when the subject in the image is isolated and the rest of the image is out of focus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Karim Ghantous Posted September 11, 2003 Share Posted September 11, 2003 Oh, just another thought: this reminds me of so-called 'bullet-time' motion photography, except you're only dealing with two simultaneous exposures, not dozens or hundreds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now