Jump to content

Dust


gene m

Recommended Posts

After washin� all of my negatives<p>

I hold them right up to the light.<p>

Hoping I get the feelin�<p>

That�s known as large format delight.<p>

 

Look at the detail and tone range !<p>

Check out that long depth of field..<p>

I think I got all of the zones that<p>

This old Tri-x can yield !<p>

 

My composition is perfect.<p>

Perspective is natural and true.<p>

To hell with old Ansel Adams.<p>

Forget old Mister Weston too.<p>

 

The sky will print nicely darkened.<p>

The clouds will be right I do trust.<p>

But suddenly their in the corner<p>

Is the twisted old demon of dust.<p>

 

And there near that cloud in the center<p>

In the middle of my perfect sky.<p>

Is a clear clump of speckles so ugly<p>

That it makes me just want to cry.<p>

 

This shot of the snow and the shadows<p>

Is all I could want it to be.<p>

Except for those grit marks and fuzzies<p>

What the hell can be wrong with me ?<p>

 

I washed the dark slides and holders.<p>

I loaded the film in the nude.<p>

I stored the holders in a vacuum.<p>

I am paranoid dust OCD dude.<p>

 

Next time I load underwater.<p>

I'll filter the water too.<p>

If you�ve any suggestions.<p>

I�d love to get word from you.<p>

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gene,

 

 

Your prose does rings true,

 

I'm so sad to say.

 

I'd stand on my head

 

to keep dust away.

 

 

I huff and I puff.

 

I vacuum and blow.

 

But the damn fuzzy dust

 

knows just where to go.

 

 

It lands in the middle

 

of my creamy gray sky.

 

Is my beautiful neg ruined?

 

Yes, that's a tear in my eye.

 

 

When I get 'em I say,

 

"I'll spot 'em out later".

 

But my spotting technique

 

makes me a spot hater.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry for not being able to respond poetically

 

My Engineer's head can only offer the following, pathetically.

 

Have you considered a sterile pressurized room, fully atmospherically controlled, 100% HEPA filtered air? Instead of loading nude and running the risk of body hair contamination (unless one shaves of course), try a biological protective bubble suit. All this is easy to sell to the spouse because it can also serve as an anthrax attack shelter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nice. I empathize, way more than I want to.

 

Kodak sucks. Why won't the bastards give us Tri-X in readyload? It might not make me a great photographer (little chance of that, sigh...) but it would let me concentrate on photography without spending endless hours standing on my head underwater (filtered) to load film holders, all in the name of getting rid of (I'd settle for just minimizing) dust.

 

Oh what I'd give for a 400 speed B&W film in readyload/quickload. I've beat on Kodak's door, Ilford and Fuji too. Sadly, it's going to take a group effort - I don't think a handful of people can convince any of them to open the door.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would like to second static charge. In fact, I find SC to be the

number one reason why I experience dust. Get rid of SC and the

dust will go away.

 

I venture into the Colorado mountains for 5 day trips every other

week and do a lot of loading out in the back country. I have been

very successful at ridding both SC and dust. I have no vacuum

cleaner or clean room to load film, yet I have managed to reduce

my dust problem by 90%. Even when I do get dust on the

negative, I have developed methods to correct for the dust spot

so nothing is wasted.

 

So zap that static charge, okay.

 

And send it to the ground

 

Straight to hell I say!

 

And will win the round

 

against the that evil dust

 

that scares your precious film.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...