Jump to content

FM2n vs FM3A


nico_bargna

Recommended Posts

Nico, check the SLRs section of this forum for a thread on the part of your question that concerns FM3A vs FM2N... as for whether it would be "better" to add an F100 to your kit, you'd need to offer more info about what & how you shoot. For some types of photography, autofocus and metering choices are worth a lot.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless you require TTL flash or aperture priority automation, I wouldn't consider the FM3a an upgrade from the FM2n. A F100 would certainly be a technological leap, with AF, advanced metering, autowinder, etc. As stated, it really comes down to what you're shooting�

 

I've been a FM2 shooter for 18 years and I'm starting to consider adding AF to my bag - I think the F100/FM2n would make a great pair, each with its own strengths and with a huge array of lenses available which will function on either body. Now, if I'm really, really good maybe I'll find one in my stocking this x-mas� tho' I'll keep saving my pennies in case St. Nick doesn't come through.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FM2n to FM3a is more a replacement than an upgrade except for TTL flash capabilities. FM2n to F100 is more a technology move than an upgrade.

 

What can't you do with your FM2n easily that you want to do? That should guide your decision. If the answer is nothing, then wait till you have a reason.

 

Either way, I'd keep the FM2n as a backup/second body.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...