Jump to content

Why the ultra disolved developer?


catherine__

Recommended Posts

Why does everyon keep talking about such large (i.e. 100:1) developer dilutions, How can anything be developed with such little developer? Why can't we just use the manfucturers suggestion and less volume? Also isn't significantly more time necessary to develop at these decreased potencies? Are these figures just for the special minox tank or can they be used with other methods as well?

Thanks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Cathy, highly dilution is a technique to handle microfilm, which has

extremely high contrast, for example Kodak Technical Pan film and

Agfa Copex Rapid etc. If one use normal dilution, the resulting

contrast will be too high and not printable. <P> High dilution slows

down the developing process, and makes it controllable, in other words

highly diluted developer tames high contrast film.<P>

 

For ordinary B&W film such as

Agfapan APX 25, 100, 400, it is not necessary to use high dilution

developer, 1:1 to 1:15 is good enough. Unless you are into ultrafine

grain microfilm, don't worry about 1:100.

 

It is indeed possible to develop Kodak Technical Pan with very

little

chemical .<p> There is a limit to the degree of dilution. Too high a dilution for example 1:200 or 1:300 only increase the development time and does not provide any added advantage.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Highly diluted developer has a property which makes it a favourite of

subminiature photographers: accutance due to the "edge effect". The border of an image ( a line for example )

is in contact with fresh developer, hence developed more than the inner part of

image, where developer is more likely to be exhausted and developed less, the result is an image detail which has

sharp edges and has higher accutance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never have used one of the high dilution developers (say Rodinal

1:100) with a film such as Technical Pan but I have used Technidol

Liquid with Tech Pan and have been quite pleased with the results

although I thought the negative was contrasty it did print well. How do

the two developers compare? A real disadvantage to the Technidol is its

shelf life once mixed--7 days. With one envelope being enough for 1

35mm roll of film that would work out to about 416 minox exposures (the

center half of two 35mm rolls which yield 4 rolls of 40 exposure and

two of 24 each). I would expect Rodinal at least to be much more

economical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Many Technical Pan photographers after tried out 1:100 Rodinal switch

from Technidol to Rodinol. It is worth a try.

<P>

Rodinal concentrate has long shelf life. It takes only about 1cc of

 

 

Rodinal to develop a roll of Minox film. I like to use the fine grain

version of Rodinal, called "Rodinal Special", it is a formular

containing Para-aminophenol (

 

Rodinol) and Hydroquinone and probably sodium suphite. Very simple to

use, take one cc of

Rodinal

Special mix it

with 80 cc distilled water, develop tech pan in 20 degree C in Minox

tank, 16 minutes

<P> But Rodinal-

Special is only available in Canada and Europe, not sold in USA.

If you try 1:100 Rodinal, don't use pure Rodinal; instead mix

the developer with distilled water with sodium sulphite added

(56 g sodium sulphite in 1 litre water )

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just developed a roll of 35mm Tech Pan with Rodinal at 100:1 mixed

with water and sodium sulfite added at 56g per liter for 6 minutes at

68F and it turned out really well. I am now going to develop a roll

of Tech Pan in my Minox developing tank using the same formula. I

note that you suggest a time of 16 minutes for Rodinal Special. What

time do you think I should use. The difference between 6 minutes and

16 minutes seems very high.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I use Rodinal-Special 1:80 dilution, 20 degree C 16 minutes.

<ol>

<li> Rodinal Special is a fine grain developer, Rodinal is not. Fine grain developer is usually milder and slower

<li> Sodium sulphite is an akaline component; the more alkali the stronger the developer, it acts like an accelerator, it shortens the development time. Kodak

DK 50 developer uses only 30 g of sodium sulphite per 1000 cc water, the alkali in your develper is almost twice that of DK50, hence the development time is very fast, but it is not a fine grain developer.

<li> If you use Minox tank, I think 6 minuites may be

sufficient for 1:100 Rodinal + sulphite, if you recycle/replenish

the developer. I suggest you start with 1 cc Rodinal in 100 cc

of distilled water (with sodium sulphite) pour 50 cc in to the tank

at every minute interval add 10cc into the center, let the developer

overflows from the snout; by the end of 6 minutes, you have used up

all the 100 cc and complete the development.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just used the method suggested by you in my Minox tank. Rodinal

1:100, 6min, 68 degrees F, replenish/replace 10ml each min. and I

want you to know that my negatives came out very very good. I would

like to try Rodinal Special sometime. It will have to wait untill my

next trip to Toronto as it is not available in Nova Scotia. Thanks

for the advice.

Charlie

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...