robert_slatkoff Posted February 10, 2001 Share Posted February 10, 2001 I would like to know if anyone is aware of what Edward Westons' technique was for taking closeups.Specifically I would like to know which lens ( focal length) was employed with a 8x10 camera and whether any extension equipement was necessary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sean_yates Posted February 10, 2001 Share Posted February 10, 2001 http://hv.greenspun.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=000Efa Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mark_minard Posted February 10, 2001 Share Posted February 10, 2001 From his daybook entry of 8/3/30, he states that he was using his 21cm.Zeiss, which was needed to fill the 8x10 frame because the pepper was so small. The pepper in this case was put in a tin funnel, which provided the background. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sean_yates Posted February 10, 2001 Share Posted February 10, 2001 And on September 18th of 1930 he wrote, "Getting closer - using a 5 inch Cooke lens on the 8 X 10 - making the heart of an artichoke to fill the entire plate - a celery heart becomes heroic..." <p> On August 29, 1927 he wrote, "Yesteday I did the pepper again, - and what a satisfaction to hac a cleanlined, brillian negative! This, and a shell negative, done yesteday too, were made with a $5 R.R. lens bought a few months ago second hand. I like the quality, and being of shorter focal length it is easier to focus and requires less exposure. I stop down to U.S. 256" <p> U.S. 256 refers to the old Uinform System aperture equivalent of f/64. By R.R. he means Rapid Rectalinear, not Rail Road. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skygzr Posted February 10, 2001 Share Posted February 10, 2001 I seem to recall that these exposures were measured in hours, and that some were ruined by his porch moving as vehicles drove by! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_goldfarb Posted February 10, 2001 Share Posted February 10, 2001 That would be about right. Figure that normal roomlight is about 1/30 sec. at f:2 at ISO 400. At f:64, if I've done the math right, that would be 32 sec. Now figure that film was probably on the order of ISO 6, if that much, in those days. That would be about 34 min., plus figure at least a stop or two or three for reciprocity, and you're up to one, two, or four hours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fred_leif Posted February 11, 2001 Share Posted February 11, 2001 Further thought: The bellows factor would also add more exposure to the calculations in addition to the other estimates provided. Filling the 8x10 frame with a 5" lens for an artichoke, pepper, etc is certainly a bit more than 1:1. <p> Fred Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now