Delta 3200 in Microphen results and question

I tried a test of Delta 3200 in Microphen this weekend. Exposed at EI3200, developed in Microphen (1:1) for 18m at 21.5C.

<p>

As expected, shadow detail is a bit lacking at EI3200. I'd guess the probable true ISO would have been between 1250 and 1600 (using the 0.1 above b+f definition). Contrast was good (i.e. not too high) and apart from the lack of shadow detail the negatives don't look bad. Maybe a little thin, but since I'll be scanning them that's not a bad thing.

<p>

There was one odd thing though. I haven't used Delta 3200 before, but it appears to me that the film base is slightly hazy, i.e. looks like a very lightly frosted glass. I though maybe I'd underfixed, but when a refixed a short section nothing really changed. Reticulation is always possible, but my dev, fix and wash are within +/- 1C of each other so reticulation is very unlikely. Maybe it's just a characteristic of the film? Has anyone else noticed this effect?

Indeed, I have had the same impression, and even more pronounced with

T-max 3200. It doesn't seem to do any harm.

Thanks. I did some quick measurments on the film and got a B+F density

of about 0.25. A zone III exposure gave a density of 0.12 above B+F so

that puts the ISO right around 1000. I was hoping that Microphen would

give me a bit more than that, but apparently not. My zone VIII

exposure measured 1.05 above B+F, so my guess that the negs were a

little thin was correct, but they scan OK so I'm not too worried about

that.

I have been using Delta 3200 for about two years now and probably

exposed over 200 rolls. Delta 3200 is a marvelous film but not at

ISO 3200. I regularly use it at ISO 1200 and develop in Xtol 1:1 or

1:3. Developed in Xtol it looks more like Delta 400. I especially

like to use it in medium format.