Jump to content

What is happing to Leica Camera Group ?


Recommended Posts

A few years ago, Leica (head quartered in Switzerland ) spinned off Leica-Camera group of Solms as an independent company; about 4 or 5 years ago,

Leica-Camera Group of Solms went public on the Frankfurt Exchange, with trading symbol

LCA. Leica even issued a special edition camera with a piece of the stock certificate "Ein Stuck "

I as recall, Leica camera stock went up for a while. But after several years,

Leica camera stock went into a tailspin, and lost nearly 80 % of initial value.

Any one knows what is happening at Leica Camera Group ?

Leica M range finder used to enjoy a monopoly position in the market. But a few years ago, new range finder cameras came out one after another,

Contax G series, Konica Hexar RF, Cossina Voigtlander Vessar etc; these cameras may have

cut into the market shares of Leica M

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Competition can only be good. Being the only show in town breeds a

bit of laziness...ie 40 year old designs still being offered, (35 and

50mm summiluxes). The amount of new lenses being designed and

marketed in the last two years exceed the offerings of the last 50.

Just like Ma Bell of just a few years ago, having no direct competion

gave them no reason to give the best product for the best price...

Now with all of the phone companies fighting for your business, they

can't rest on their name only.

 

<p>

 

Leica should be able to raise to the challenge and keep their place

at the top of the heap. When the consumer can buy the "this"

or "that"... the "that" better be pretty good. I'll bet the

proliferation of new leica improvments continues.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Leica did come up with many new lens and camera body designs in the pass few years, precisely due the infusion of investor money.

Hoever, since investors have lost a great deal of money in LCA shares, which lost almost 80% of value, it many not be easy for them to raise new money ( lost financial credibility )

In today's business world, beside sheer competion, there is a Darwinism at work, ie, big fish eats up smaller fish.

For instance, Samsung ate Rollei stock and barrel, not because Samsung has better lens, but because Samsung has more profit.

Leica now being a public company and with stock price at such depressed level is extremely vulnerable to being taken over.

Samsung, Kyocera or even Sigma could ate up Leica in one bite--- it is not far fetched.

Of course, after Samsung digested Rollei, Rollei is doing quite well , lot of new products.

So can Leica makes a come back on its own, it is still an open question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Leica is only marginally profitable, alas. US $20 Million will let

you buy a majority share, $40 million the whole company. The

management is very concerned that this will happen; thus causing them

to lose control over the brand and the product concepts and quality

ethos.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree that Leica will indeed be in big problems as the digital

revolution continues as I fear that the current generation of camera

buyers will think that Leica are old technology (which indeed they

are) so this really does mean that the future of the company as it is

presently stands must be in doubt. In some ways, to be taken over is

good, but only if the new owner believes in the quality of the brand

and wishes to maintain that quality by evolving the system and I feel

that this must mean going more digital and also more reflex-oriented,

if only because the rangefinder is, whatever its merits, a niche

market. So they probably need a large electronics-savvy company like

Olympus, but someone who does not directly compete with them at

present. Of course they tried this before with Minolta and Leica did

well out of this, but it is no longer continuing. What is needed is

more products like the Hexar RF (which indeed should have been a

Leica) or even the CLE. The R8 is a good product, but without the

marketing muscle of the Japanese companies it is very difficult to

make any headway. Of course even with digital systems optical

performance is still very important, so Leica's reputation can serve

it well for the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I love Leicas, both those I own and have owned over the years, and

the ones I can only read about or see in museums. Yes, I admit it, I

actually USE them to make pictures. Which brings up my point. It

appears that the current designers are not photographers as Oscar

was. Everything he designed worked, and improved the ease of use of

his camera. Don't these people ever look at or use other cameras?

The Olympus OM1 should have been the original Leicaflex, instead they

couldn't even design a shutter speed dial to turn in the same

direction as their M models. And it's been downhill from there. Oh,

I DO wish they'd hire a working 35mm photographer to help design the

new camera. I, of course, am available. CHEAP!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Bill

 

<p>

 

The first Leicaflex was introduced in 1965, the OM-1 in 1973 - the

Olympus OM system seems to be virtually dead and the OM-1 certainly

is. The R8 is a superb camera actually and has clearly been designed

for a working photographer - in fact it is one of the easiest cameras

to use, M or R. I suspect that many M users discount the reflexes

because of their size (and in addition to having non-rangefinder

viewing). However the current size of most 35mm SLRs shows that the

trend of having small reflexes has past, so the R8 should have no

trouble competing. If you want a reflex that is small, anyway, the

R6.2 fits the bill - it is smaller than most others on the market and

is a superb working photographer's tool. It has very few

idiosyncracies. The M's certainly have quite a few idiosyncracies.

Personally, I have always felt that Leica have not marketed

themselves with anything like the skill of the Japanese manufacturers

who embraced wholeheartedly the US style of appealing direct to the

public. They are doing much better now, but it is still poor in

comparison. I do think that if the Japanese had continmued to sell

rangefinders through the sixties and seventies then the M leica would

probably be extinct. In fact, they switched completely to reflexes to

great success. They finished off the great Contarex and Voigtlander

lines, but happily not the Leicaflex. Leica is right to aim high, so

it needs great handling abilities and great optics. Now it needs

marketing muscle and investment to continue the development of new

killer optics, which are the heart of the Leica system M or R. The

trouble is to convince people that this optical and mechanical

quality is worth paying for - that is where the marketing comes in.

We think it is worth paying for - but we may be deluded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...