anders_andersson Posted March 2, 1999 Share Posted March 2, 1999 How4s the optical and mechanical quality of the EOS 20 mm 2.8 lens compared with the 17-35 2.8, 20-35 3.5-4.5 and other comparable lenses from 3rd party manufactors? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sean_hester Posted March 16, 1999 Share Posted March 16, 1999 the 20mm prime is better then any zoom in the ultra wide range. but all three canon lenses are very close. they are all about the same as far as ergonomics go. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dr_peter_harper Posted March 30, 1999 Share Posted March 30, 1999 The 17-35L Canon lens was a big disappointment to me. Very soft on the edges at 17,20,28mm. I've look around and done a lot of testing of various lenses in these focal lengths. Finally decided to return to the 20-35 L Canon. Nothing between this lens and the 20 f2,8. And much more flexible too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now