mark45831 Posted April 22, 2022 Share Posted April 22, 2022 I recently got back a A-1 that was barrowed about 20 years ago, I have the 50 1.4 on but was wanting to add a couple nice portrait lens. what's your suggestions? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laurencecochrane Posted April 22, 2022 Share Posted April 22, 2022 Depends what you have to spend. Cheapest a 135 f3.5 or a zoom f3.5 up to fast 80's 85's 100 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven_endo Posted April 22, 2022 Share Posted April 22, 2022 The first fd lens I bought with my own money was the BL f1.8, 85mm. Loved the photos of my friends i took with it. Gave great perspective and DOF whether close up or whole body length. I've since purchased an 85mm, f1 2L but haven't really taken any portraits to compare with the 1.8... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ken Katz Posted April 22, 2022 Share Posted April 22, 2022 The FD 85 f1.8 would be great, but they seem to be selling for $350 or more. The FD 100 f2 seems to be selling for outrageous amounts on eBay (like $1,500+). I Owned the FD 100 F2.8 for many years and thought it was a sharp lens, and they are also available for a more reasonable amount. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jim_bielecki1 Posted April 22, 2022 Share Posted April 22, 2022 Can't go wrong with the FD 100/2.8. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven_endo Posted April 23, 2022 Share Posted April 23, 2022 The FD 85 f1.8 would be great, but they seem to be selling for $350 or more. The FD 100 f2 seems to be selling for outrageous amounts on eBay (like $1,500+). I Owned the FD 100 F2.8 for many years and thought it was a sharp lens, and they are also available for a more reasonable amount. This post got me curious about FD lens prices so I checked out KEH (haven'tlooked for a few years). WTH is going on with FD prices??!!? 85mm, f1.8, BL lenses used to go for less than $100. $500 for UG rated lenses? Are the cinematic lens conversions driving the prices? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Naka Posted April 23, 2022 Share Posted April 23, 2022 Depends on what YOU consider a portrait, and what lens you need for that. Back in the film days, for head and shoulder, it was a Nikon 105. But it really depends on how big the group (number of people), how tight the shot (full length to tight face), and how far you are from the subject. Environmental portraits are wider, to include whatever environment or object the subject wants in the pic. I've used from 24mm up to 300mm. I did an indoor multi-person family portrait with a 24. My back was literally up against the wall. If I had a 20 I would have used it. I shot a portrait across a fish pond, with a 300. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDMvW Posted April 23, 2022 Share Posted April 23, 2022 If you don't mind manual aperture as well as manual focus, you can get one of the best short teles (portrait lens) ever made for not much money used. I am talking the Nikkor-P non-AI 105mm f/2.5 around $80. A Nikon>Canon FD adapter for about $13. You can meter through the lens too. You can pay more than this for the adapter, but there's no glass in the adaptors, so no image degradation Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Seaman Posted April 23, 2022 Share Posted April 23, 2022 I had an FD 100mm F/4 macro lens, never used it for portraits but they don't seem to be too expensive. It would also do macro of course. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
laurencecochrane Posted April 23, 2022 Share Posted April 23, 2022 Just bought one on Evilbay £114 delivered. A 100mm f2.8. UNFORTUNATLY all my camera gear including my F1 New and A1 are in storage at my sisters (had to clear up the flat. All my strobes all my MF cameras and my V600) So to still get my fix I bought a Canon 7D MkII (with two year warranty) with grip and Sigma 18 200 OKAY NOT THE LATEST AND GREATEST But boy what a camera espeically foi sports and wildlife 10 FPS WOW and quiet too. Need to get my gear back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jon_wason Posted May 13, 2022 Share Posted May 13, 2022 This post got me curious about FD lens prices so I checked out KEH (haven'tlooked for a few years). WTH is going on with FD prices??!!? 85mm, f1.8, BL lenses used to go for less than $100. $500 for UG rated lenses? Are the cinematic lens conversions driving the prices? I think what is driving the prices up is the young hipsters using the vintage lenses on digital cameras via an adaptor. My two cents worth. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCL Posted May 13, 2022 Share Posted May 13, 2022 So, Mark,(OP) what did you get? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barryreid Posted May 20, 2022 Share Posted May 20, 2022 I think what is driving the prices up is the young hipsters using the vintage lenses on digital cameras via an adaptor. My two cents worth. Nope the cool kids don't really use digital cameras so much these days, at least in arty Urban areas like London's Hackney. Nor do most of them buy lenses they just use 50/1.8's on the AE-1 bodies which supplement their phone and/or Instax. I guess some buy UWA lenses if they are into Skateboarding. The big price rises are driven by the Cine boys looking for a less clinical look. It has been noted on some Video-centric sites that certain FD lenses have some commonality with Canon's 1970's K-35 series. It started with the Asph. lenses, but it's trickled down and FD B/L stills lenses have generally soared - basically if a lens has S.S.C. on the front it's value moves up. You'll notice that, for example, the 17mm S.S.C. breechblock lens can sell at a price multiple of FDn version, in spite of the IDENTICAL optics and coating, due to the magic letters on the bezel. There are a couple of exceptions, are good lenses like the 100/2 which are now back to what are realistic prices for the quality driven by MILC users So, for the OP, and anyone else looking at FD lenses you'll get a better deal on FDn stuff. I'm good with this as, for the most part, I prefer the FDn versions and tend to look for the newest I can find. For the particular request, prices being where they are, off-brand is good; the Tamron SP 90/2.5 can do decent portrait work, as can most 90-105 macros with 2.5-2.8 apertures. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
steven_endo Posted May 21, 2022 Share Posted May 21, 2022 (edited) ...It started with the Asph. lenses, but it's trickled down and FD B/L stills lenses have generally soared - basically if a lens has S.S.C. on the front it's value moves up. Could it be because the B/L lenses may be (are?) more robust because they have more metal components? Or, perhaps, because the B/L mount is much simpler than the "bayonet" design of the FDn lenses, they're easier to modify? TBH, I have no idea what exactly is done to modify Canon lenses to make cine mounts. Edited May 21, 2022 by steven_endo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
barryreid Posted May 21, 2022 Share Posted May 21, 2022 I dug in to this as a mate of mine is a cameraman and knows I have FD stuff, so he asked me if any was for sale - a mate of his was looking for some lenses to convert. For the eye watering lay expensive high end sets the lens body doesn’t matter - as ther will be little to nothing left. Check this kit; G.L. Optics Mk V - Canon Vintage FD 7 - Lens Set - cinemaglass.com Note that there will be at least one FDn lens in there (the 135/2) and at least one FD B/L (55/1.2). 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
david_hruska Posted June 30, 2022 Share Posted June 30, 2022 IMO the best FD portrait lense is the soft focus 85 mm 2.8. The one truly made for portraits. There are three settings to choose from. Particularly for film, it provides endless opportunities. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulo_bernardo_trindade Posted July 6, 2022 Share Posted July 6, 2022 I use the fdnew 85mmf1.8, the new fd 100f2 and the new fd 135f2, all excellent, Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwhitegeog Posted January 6, 2023 Share Posted January 6, 2023 Yes, there is a lovely 135mm f2.0 or f2.8; there is also the 85mm f1.8 or the 100m f2.0 or f2.8 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDMvW Posted January 13, 2023 Share Posted January 13, 2023 (edited) There is a plethora of really fine medium focal length FD lenses. There are also a number of really nice 35-~80-something zooms. One of them is even push-button autofocus: Edited January 13, 2023 by JDMvW 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SCL Posted January 13, 2023 Share Posted January 13, 2023 You really have a wide choice depending on what you want to portray as a portrait. I've done some really neat ones with a 50mm, as well as the 135/2.0. I had the 100/2.0 for a few years, but never really connected with it. I recently picked up a 55/1.2 FL, but haven't tried it yet for portraits, although I suspect wide open it will do a fine job. As mentioned earlier, the Tamron 90 on a Canon adapter can do an impressive job as well, although I use mine for macro work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gwhitegeog Posted January 18, 2023 Share Posted January 18, 2023 The 'cheap' FD135mm f2.8 is great as is the 100mm f2.8 - if you want wider, go for the f2.0 versions if you can find (afford!) one. I have a beautiful FD 85mm f1.8 which is 'L' quality in all but name. The 28-85f4 is also a great zoom, but you'll obviously have a smaller maximum aperture. If you want to go for an older breechlock ssc lens, there is a 100-200 f2.5 zoom I believe. With my FD and EF equipment, I have generally favoured a 135mm lens for portraits. It has a flattering perspective and allows you to get a comfortable distance from the subject but still with good magnification. I used to take my light and compact FD 135mm f2.8 with me all the time when traveling in the pre-digital days. In fact, I have just bought one for ca. $50 from eBay Japan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now