michaellinder Posted May 3, 2021 Share Posted May 3, 2021 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luis triguez Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 palm tree Canon PowerShot SX220 HS 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bgelfand Posted May 5, 2021 Share Posted May 5, 2021 Taken in Elk Grove, CA, 26 December 2018 @ 11:02 AM Nikon D750 1/2500 sec, f/13, ISO 640 (Auto) Tamron SP 90mm f/2.8 Di Macro VC USD F017N Range: 0.56 meters This a a two-for image. If you look at the circled area (full-size), you will see a small green spider. Perhaps I should also post under "Insects"? :) I did not notice the spider until I processed the image at 1:1 in Lightroom. Nice lens the Tamron. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mpressionz Posted May 13, 2021 Share Posted May 13, 2021 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerald Cafferty Posted May 21, 2021 Share Posted May 21, 2021 What qualifies as macro in this forum, is it just a photo taken with a lens that has macro written on it? 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
michaellinder Posted May 21, 2021 Author Share Posted May 21, 2021 What qualifies as macro in this forum, is it just a photo taken with a lens that has macro written on it? [ATTACH=full]1388942[/ATTACH] GC, is your question intended to be satirical? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandy Vongries Posted May 21, 2021 Share Posted May 21, 2021 Frankly, one of those curious arguments which I sidestep by not labeling a photo as anything in particular. Here is a good cut at the description of a macro. The classic definition of macro photography is that the image projected onto the digital sensor (or film plane) should be the same size as the subject. With a 1:1 ratio, a DSLR with a full-frame chip should be able to produce life-size magnification and focus on an area as small as 24x36mm. Lens Reviews 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gerald Cafferty Posted May 21, 2021 Share Posted May 21, 2021 GC, is your question intended to be satirical? Michael, it was more rhetorical than satirical. But as you have answered I do have a problem with some of the posts in the "Macro Forum". The definition supplied by Sandy is the usual one referenced , but expecting 1:1 is may be a step to far. My most used lens for close-ups is only 1:2, surely some attempt at close focus is needed or what's the point. BR...............GC. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDMvW Posted May 21, 2021 Share Posted May 21, 2021 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Di Leo Posted May 25, 2021 Share Posted May 25, 2021 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick Bortnick Posted May 25, 2021 Share Posted May 25, 2021 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjmurray Posted June 14, 2021 Share Posted June 14, 2021 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Di Leo Posted June 14, 2021 Share Posted June 14, 2021 Interestingly, JDL’s photo is 130 times the size of JDM’s (13MB v 100 KB) but the resolution looks the same on PN. Smugmug changed the way they link photos and I haven't done so for a while. I think I have it now, but sorry for the huge image Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rodeo_joe1 Posted June 18, 2021 Share Posted June 18, 2021 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frankmercer Posted June 18, 2021 Share Posted June 18, 2021 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sallymack Posted July 6, 2021 Share Posted July 6, 2021 (edited) Having trouble uploading file. Edited July 6, 2021 by sallymack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sallymack Posted July 6, 2021 Share Posted July 6, 2021 Backlighting, anyone? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
davidspahr Posted August 13, 2021 Share Posted August 13, 2021 The largest flower is about 1/16th inch across. Didn't notice the eggs until I looked through the viewfinder. Canon T5, Canon 100mm f2.8 USM Macro Lens 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
corey_narsted Posted August 19, 2021 Share Posted August 19, 2021 Am I the only one who thinks flowers look kinda messed-up when you start to get really close to them? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nail33 Posted August 19, 2021 Share Posted August 19, 2021 Am I the only one who thinks flowers look kinda messed-up when you start to get really close to them? [ATTACH=full]1398770[/ATTACH] Yes :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sandy Vongries Posted August 19, 2021 Share Posted August 19, 2021 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Allen Herbert Posted August 20, 2021 Share Posted August 20, 2021 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now