Jump to content

103 film width


nze_christian

Recommended Posts

the 103 spool fit in special holder like a roll of 4 inch width to give

4*5 images .

It was also use on ld camera like Bull eye 4 and Panoram.

 

<p>

 

I asking bergger to make me some film which has the same

width as this film but I don't know the precise size.

 

<p>

 

Is it 4 inch or a less.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Christian, I checked out Walker Mangum's Kodak Collector's site, and

he lists (with Thom Bell's site as the source) 103 film as having a

"picture area" as 3 3/4 in. x 4 3/4 in. If you go to this site, it's

under the heading "History of Kodak Roll Film". With production dates

from 1896-March 1949, it's a safe bet that the original film was

nitrate base. I suppose you could check with Film for Classics to see

if they stock a substitute, or have any more info. Here this is

Mangum's site:

http://www.nwmangum.com/Kodak/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Christian, I think part of the cost (or an addition??) to the Film for

Classics stuff, is a deposit on the spool itself. They have varying

amounts for the different types of film. I can understand the price of

the film given the limited market for this stuff, but I'm just curious

about Bergger. Is it any cheaper to get them to custom make the film

for you? Unless you have a collection of the spools to begin with. I

don't have any experience with Bergger so if they do alot of special

order stuff, never mind the question...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The last time I spoke with film for classics (RECENTLY) they were

*not* selling verichrome 103 anymore. however, i buy 5" aerial plus

from them. it ain't cheap either: $20 for a 4' roll. they *might* cut

aerial to 103, but i wouldn't count on it. btw, 103 is only about

3-11/16" wide, at least what i bought from them was that wide, and it

fit a kodak panorama #4 perfectly, which was designed for that film.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 20 years later...

Film should be slightly narrower, such that the paper sort-of seals to the spool ends.

(Even though a little light usually gets through, and fogs the film edge.)

I am not so sure that sites with tables of widths keep this distinction.

 

You should be able to get the film width measuring the space between film guides,

though cheaper cameras might not have anything to measure.

 

It is strange, though, that some films are nice inch values, and others nice mm values.

 

As for custom slitting, I once cut down some film on an ordinary paper cutter, with electrical

tape to mark the width that I wanted it. (So I could feel it in the dark.)

-- glen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Only 20 years too late to be of use to the OP!

 

It's a bit like expecting a modern cycle-shop to have a spare tyre for an 'ordinary' (penny-farthing) bicycle. Or rolling into Kwik-Fit in a model T Ford for a new exhaust system.

 

Eventually, you have to face obsolescence.

Edited by rodeo_joe|1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only 20 years too late to be of use to the OP!

 

It's a bit like expecting a modern cycle-shop to have a spare tyre for an 'ordinary' (penny-farthing) bicycle. Or rolling into Kwik-Fit in a model T Ford for a new exhaust system.

 

Eventually, you have to face obsolescence.

 

I suppose so, but the comment I wrote apply to any film size, and any time.

 

It seems that 120 goes back to 1901, so still around after 120 years.

-- glen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...