Jump to content

Need MF Scanner


laurencecochrane

Recommended Posts

The V600 is a later model, instant on. I used one for ten years scanning MF. Currently, it's around $225 new. But Epson sometimes has refurbished ones on sale at around $140 with a one year warranty. I just checked. Unfortunately, they don't have any now. But you could call them to see if any are coming up soon. Good luck.

Epson Clearance Center | Epson US

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello everyone. I have used the Epson V600 for almost 11 years now. Have (2), one in Wa. state and here in Hawaii. The Better Scanning insert for 120 and Anti Newton Ring glass inserts for the stock plastic Epson 35mm 990479467_2k20-076-012cces13bc-horz.jpg.bab1dbbb7eb1770ab43570e2887e6a2d.jpg 990479467_2k20-076-012cces13bc-horz.jpg.bab1dbbb7eb1770ab43570e2887e6a2d.jpg negative carrier. I find no fault with the MF scans, even with my Agfa Isolette cameras, which are not the "ultimate" with the Apotar lenses. Here are two test frames of EDU 200 film (35 & 120 formats) with the Isolette 3 on 120 and a Fed-2 / Jupiter for the 35mm. Both films developed in Pyrocat HDC. Aloha, Bill
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good choice I'd say , having used one almost non stop for over half a decade . Before spending any further money , might I suggest

a thin plate of glass over the negatives and then scan . Sometimes with slide film you may get Newtonian rings and sometimes not .

It works surprisingly well for me . Peter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
It's a bit costly, but the Better Scanning 6x6 insert is tack sharp with an ANR glass cover. Same also for ANR glass inserts on the "crappy" Epson plastic 35mm carrier. Also consider scaning negs emulsion down. The native Epson software allows EZ flip or flop of positive image. Bill
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Just WRT Newton's rings:

Some years ago I came across the filmholder from some sort of professional printer/copier/enlarger. It was fitted with multicoated glass, which, thinking about it, was obviously there to prevent interference rings. Since it's the change of refractive index between glass, film and any trapped air that causes Newton's rings.

 

So a simple solution, other than the usual horrible dimpled AN glass, would be to use the glass from a multi-coated UV filter as a pressure plate on the film base. But having said that, I use an old and heavy metal glassless negative carrier for film copying, and rarely get other than perfect focus from corner to corner.

DSC04405s.thumb.jpg.29821ca3db1c6abf788695c282e0f3fd.jpg

Edit: Including the small hair I've just noticed and that I forgot to spot out! :oops:

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

V850 is for large format sheet film.V600 up to 120

The V850 also has higher dMax for penetrating denser areas of the film. There are two sets of holders for each format. Plus each holder has a built-in glass side that holds the negatives flat. Film holders' heights can be adjusted for maximum sharpness. It has Silverfast software in addition to the Epsonscan if you want to use it, but it;s not the Silverfast with the most bells and whistles. There's a wet mount holder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

V850 is for large format sheet film.V600 up to 120

 

Specifically, many scanners can scan larger documents, but the back light for film isn't so big.

 

You have to read the specifications carefully to figure this out.

 

Some scanners have two sensors, one for full width and one for a narrower width.

It might be that in some the focal position is different for the two.

That is, ones for transparencies focus slightly above the glass.

Again, this is hard to find in the specifications.

-- glen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You can use a piece of Anti-Newton glass to cover the film. I have used a mask cut from black mounting board (black all the way through) about 2 mm thick with the glass on top. Anti-reflective glass for picture frames works well and is inexpensive. Place the film emulsion side down, as it tends to cup upwards in the center. That way it touches the scanner glass only at the edges, and the AN glass prevents rings where it touches in the center.

 

Most "affordable" photo scanners use a microlens array rather than a single, photo quality lens, which place the plane of focus at the surface of the scanner glass. Exceptions would be the discontinued 800 models and the commercial Expression line, with deep bases (4-6 inches) to accommodate the lens and mirrors. These expensive scanners could focus on the glass for documents and about 2 mm higher for negative in a holder. A few had auto focus. For comparison, my Epson Expression 1600 cost $1300 near the turn of the century, with resolution close to the advertised 1600 ppi. These days inexpensive scanners advertise 6400 ppi (and deliver 1600).

 

You can determine the plane of best focus by placing an steel engineering rule flat on the glass, propping one end up with a pencil, and observing which markings are the sharpest. With a little trigonometry, you can put accurate numbers on that measurement.

 

If you are serious about MF film, the best approach to scanning for less than $3K (e.g., a used Nikon LS-9000) is to use a lighted copy table with a digital camera. The resolution is as good or better than all but a dedicated film scanner, and about 4x faster, including sorting, cleaning and positioning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...