alfonsomartinez Posted February 14, 2021 Share Posted February 14, 2021 Well...I could not resist this one... Cannot wait to take this one out for some picture taking too! The initial function/feature tests did well as well as the exposure meter. So I will confirm this when I test both cameras after this winter weather clears up. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDMvW Posted February 15, 2021 Share Posted February 15, 2021 I can imagine that you couldn't resist this one. especially with the 'kit'. Will look forward to the results. German (of which this Kodak is) cameras of this era had that fat, thick, and prosperous look. My roommate from Kiel, BRD, had an Agfa SLR that also had the "look". 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
conrad_hoffman Posted February 15, 2021 Share Posted February 15, 2021 Is it a IIIc or IIIC ? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johnfantastic Posted February 15, 2021 Share Posted February 15, 2021 Is it a IIIc or IIIC ? hello conrad, can you tell me the difference of a IIIc and a IIIC? I would like to know? :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
charles_stobbs3 Posted February 15, 2021 Share Posted February 15, 2021 Both rangefinder and viewfinder windows are large (same size). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jeffrey L.T. von Glück Posted February 15, 2021 Share Posted February 15, 2021 Fine looking kit. The Kodak Retinas of that era were substantial. I had an uncle give me his Retina IIIS kit with all the lenses from 28mm to 135mm. The IIIS itself was on the fritz, so he bought me a Kodak Instamatic Reflex, which used all the Retina interchangeable lenses for the Reflexes and the IIIS rangefinder. I used that for about a year, then bought the Canon F-1 when it was first introduced. 1 Jeffrey L. T. von Gluck Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
conrad_hoffman Posted February 15, 2021 Share Posted February 15, 2021 Ah, now I see. I thought the large meter was the clue, but the big C also has a big rangefinder, so it's a IIIc. Regardless, very nice! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rodeo_joe1 Posted February 16, 2021 Share Posted February 16, 2021 Interesting that you have the large diameter version Curtagon front-section converter. Mine's the small diameter version, and I've always wondered if there's any noticeable optical difference between the two. Interesting that the meter has no range-changing flap either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alfonsomartinez Posted February 18, 2021 Author Share Posted February 18, 2021 From Chris Sherlock web site, "The final change in exposure meters was the move to a single range meter in July 1957. This meter had film speed settings from ASA 5 to ASA 1300 and is identical in style with that fitted to the later IIIC, Retina IB, Retina Reflex and the Retinette IIB. The alloy casting and chrome flap were replaced with a plastic moulded meter housing. Cameras with the new single range meter are found from serial number 722045. With this change the IIIc was now known as a type 021 Ausf. II." In addition, the user's manual had an extra page of instructions added between the cover and the first page...see the photos: The front side of the added page: The back side of the added page: Otherwise, the rest of the manual is the same any other Retina IIIc guide. The exposure meter so far is just -0.5 EV in all initial tested reflected lighting scenes. I think this pretty darn good for a 65 year camera! Cannot wait for the harsh winter weather that is bogging down Texas to clear out...I cleaned up both Kodak Retina cameras and ready to go shooting with newly arrived film! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alfonsomartinez Posted March 11, 2022 Author Share Posted March 11, 2022 Finally, I have some time to update this posting. I took my Kodak Retina out (and from on it is now my tag-along camera!) for testing using E100 film last summer. Here are four photos from that roll. I went to the President Bush National Library nd Museum (College Station, TX) and shot a test roll to gauge if the selenium meter is working. Good news--in daytime it is spot on. Early morning and late evening--it is off by an 1/2EV. (Guess that's expected.) Lens: 50mm/f:2 AV: f/8 TV: 250 EV: 14 Lens: 50mm/f:2 AV: f/4 TV: 500 EV: 13 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alfonsomartinez Posted March 11, 2022 Author Share Posted March 11, 2022 Lens: 50mm/f:2 AV: f/5.6 TV: 500 EV: 14 Lens: 80mm/f:4 AV: f/8 TV: 250 EV: 14 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kmac Posted March 11, 2022 Share Posted March 11, 2022 Very nice result. I've only exposed B&W in my 111c so far and it was excellent, so color should be good also, looking at your pics. I hit the auto levels button and did a little cropping for this one. Great shot, good camera, I'm very pleased with mine as I'm sure you will be with yours. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ralf_j. Posted March 11, 2022 Share Posted March 11, 2022 Very nice results and scenery - appreciate that you have come back to update this post, a good way to keep our discussions going. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JDMvW Posted March 11, 2022 Share Posted March 11, 2022 PLUS ONE on Ralf_j Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now