Jump to content

Kant see it?


Recommended Posts

  • Replies 92
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

"ffering anything of substance to show you even have the vaguest idea of the subject at hand"

 

Jeez, obviously you(;)) and Kant are above us simply folks, a superior form of humanity;) Lets have a look what he is actually saying rather than the words of a tax declaration....a honest declaration;)

 

" Our perceptions, for Kant, bring us a representation and sometimes an enhancement and sometimes a restricted or even false view of reality. Photos can do the same"

 

Holy Maceral Batman , I cannot believe photographs, sometimes give a restricted or even false view of reality., Deep thought man.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've mentioned this before, but my wife had a huge Irish Setter bitch who would get two other dogs to fight, and then stand aside and watch. She was, overall, a swell dog. aside from this flaw.

 

Why did I think of this, I wonder?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Press the damn button already!

pj, do you think the Philosophy of Photography forum was set up to be an aid in finger dexterity or is it possible another purpose might have been contemplated? According to at least one great button pusher, the most important part of the camera isn’t the button. It’s the twelve inches behind it. Regardless, pushing the button and philosophy/discussion aren’t mutually exclusive.

 

Have a nice day!

"You talkin' to me?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

pj, do you think the Philosophy of Photography forum was set up to be an aid in finger dexterity or is it possible another purpose might have been contemplated? According to at least one great button pusher, the most important part of the camera isn’t the button. It’s the twelve inches behind it. Regardless, pushing the button and philosophy/discussion aren’t mutually exclusive.

 

Have a nice day!

And unless that bit that's so many inches behind the button has already decided it wants to be behind that nutton and to press that thing, we're not talking photography.

It's that important.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apart from the bit of banter, you interest me.q.g..

 

Moving Kant aside, my thoughts on Art, is not about the medium used, but about the creativity in medium .Regardless..

 

So, I see you as person putting Art in little confined box, to suit your personal perception. I find this weird. But interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Apart from the bit of banter, you interest me.q.g..

 

Moving Kant aside, my thoughts on Art, is not about the medium used, but about the creativity in medium .Regardless..

 

So, I see you as person putting Art in little confined box, to suit your personal perception. I find this weird. But interesting.

A "little confined box" re anything you mentioned in your above (quoted) post, Allen? Now that is weird. Do explain.

 

Meanwhile: creativity is not confined to art. It is a property (of just about everything we do), but not a specific difference. So creativity alone is not enough to 'define' art.

A focus on creativity is a focus that makes you miss the essential bit. It's one little box you can't stick a label "art" on.

 

What more, then, is part of that other thread.

 

Focus, by the way, is not an imperative in photography.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Walking the walk ...

[ATTACH=full]1374616[/ATTACH]

the art of blacksmithing

 

Sam, I really was touched by this image. I suspect that the collaboration by the two men wasn't an accident. It seems that four hands were necessary to ensure that the hammer blow on the molten metal had the exact amount of force.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"A focus on creativity is a focus that makes you miss the essential bit. It's one little box you can't stick a label "art" on"q.g

 

There we go. Art, really belongs in a little box, that you cannot put a label on.

 

The interesting thought ; who puts Art into that little box, that apparently you cannot put a label on?

 

Art does not need labels, or, little boxes, it is universal, not subject to moiré, and cult of the few.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...