Jump to content

Nikon S3 and S3 2000 Rangefinders


Recommended Posts

I looked at an Amedeo before I decided on the S3.

Until now I’ve always rotated multiple lenses on a single body.

I expect that I will do the opposite at some point if that Nikon S lens turns out to be as good as some say.

Best to always keep the options open....

 

Amedeo Lens Adapter Leica M Nikon Rangefinder

Edited by Moving On
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a Canon IID2, bought from Goodwill with no CLA.

 

As well as I can tell, it works fine. The shutter speeds might be a little off, but not so far.

 

The Canon P is one of the better values in used LTM cameras, other than the Soviet models.

-- glen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

What is your budget? You can spend very little, or quite a lot, or anything in between. Just to experiment without spending much money? This was my actual first camera period (and first rangefinder too). Great fixed lens, but no meter. Good rangefinder too. The Konica I. Pretty dirt simple. An old Leica M2 or M3 with a vintage lens, say the 50/2 collapsable summicron is relatively cheap. And as users the Canon rangefinders like the P and the 7 are really nice machines for using if you can get one in good condition. Don't know anything about the S3 except that it's quite attractive. It's essentially a cross between a Contax II and a Leica. It looks like a Contax and the lenses are similar (though not totally compatible) and the internals are more leica like (which is a good thing really). Likely to be pricey because I think Nikon rangefinders tend to be pretty collectable.

http://farm5.staticflickr.com/4100/4820775582_737764e616.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 years later...
Ya, I had that happen, too. Buying a S3 2000 this week with the kit 50/1.4 lens. I am excited as of all my Nikon and Leica cameras I have and still have, never have I owned a Nikon Rangefinder.

kivis

 

Cameras, lenses, and fotos

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, for one thing it clutters up the site. Makes new information harder to find. People waste time answering questions again that were long settled...

 

I put in a "wink" = why so serious?

IMO Extending existing threads of a relevant subject does the opposite: collects related information in existing threads which improves continuity and reduce clutter.

And seriously, how much new information is posted on photo.net? Especially in this case - 20 years old re-releases of cameras 60+ years old?

And I didn't know that "wink" meant that you are not serious, then why do you post?

Niels
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I didn't know that "wink" meant that you are not serious, then why do you post?

 

You don't know what a wink is? Interesting.

 

And seriously, how much new information is posted on photo.net?

 

"Ignore and move on if not interested." some person said earlier.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...