Jump to content

If You Could Keep Just One Classic Camera?


mjferron

Recommended Posts

But there's a real possibility that I'd opt for the Nikonos instead. It's a unique camera and the lenses have the best scale focusing mechanism I've seen. The little moving pincers clearly show the effects of aperture on focus and depth of field.

 

Perhaps inspired by the similar nifty red coupled DOF pincers on the original Hasselblad C lenses, only Nikon went even further by making them more visible and dust/water sealed! The later Hassy CF and CFi lenses (which dropped the moving DOF pincers) always seemed less unique, more ordinary.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 92
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Perhaps inspired by the similar nifty red coupled DOF pincers on the original Hasselblad C lenses, only Nikon went even further by making them more visible and dust/water sealed! The later Hassy CF and CFi lenses (which dropped the moving DOF pincers) always seemed less unique, more ordinary.

 

The Hassy lenses are much prettier. The Nikonos lenses are more Frankensteinish by comparison with their two prominent knobs, - but it's part of their appeal to me.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

From a purely practical picture-taking standpoint I suppose I'd have to go with my Nikon F4. I have vastly more Nikkors in the stable than any others and the F4 works happily with all of them. It allows me to work however I want at the moment, quickly or in deliberate contemplation, and does it all with grace, ease and composure. There is the issue of carting all of that mass around, but I've not become feeble as yet so it isn't a huge problem.

 

From a joy-of-use standpoint I'd keep the Leicaflex SL-2, but a shortage of funds to expand the lens selection limits possibilities.

 

If image quality were the prime consideration it would be the Hasselblad 500C (for which I only have the 100 f3.5 Planar), Rolleiflex 3.5 Xenotar or SL-66 with 80 f2.8 Planar. Choosing between those would be nigh unto impossible...

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
Just a fun survey. In my case it would probably come down to my 1957 Yashicamat or my Olympus OM2n.

In favor of the Yashica would be the 100% all metal construction and the overall beauty of the camera itself. It is an attention getter for sure. Not to mention the nice MF image quality.

 

Despite liking my old Nikons The OM2n is a little gem. Compact, huge viewfinder and again very nice on the eyes. A very pretty camera in chrome. The reason I would keep the Oly over the Nikons comes down to this. The 28mm 3.5 lens. Good at all stops but for scenic work crank it down to F8-F11 and it is one of the best lenses on film I've ever used. IMO world class as is the fine construction of Olympus prime lenses.

 

Because of versatility and portability, in the end The OM2n with the 28 3,5 and a 50mm would be my choice if I could just keep one.

Just a fun survey. In my case it would probably come down to my 1957 Yashicamat or my Olympus OM2n.

In favor of the Yashica would be the 100% all metal construction and the overall beauty of the camera itself. It is an attention getter for sure. Not to mention the nice MF image quality.

 

Despite liking my old Nikons The OM2n is a little gem. Compact, huge viewfinder and again very nice on the eyes. A very pretty camera in chrome. The reason I would keep the Oly over the Nikons comes down to this. The 28mm 3.5 lens. Good at all stops but for scenic work crank it down to F8-F11 and it is one of the best lenses on film I've ever used. IMO world class as is the fine construction of Olympus prime lenses.

 

Because of versatility and portability, in the end The OM2n with the 28 3,5 and a 50mm would be my choice if I could just keep one.

Just a fun survey. In my case it would probably come down to my 1957 Yashicamat or my Olympus OM2n.

In favor of the Yashica would be the 100% all metal construction and the overall beauty of the camera itself. It is an attention getter for sure. Not to mention the nice MF image quality.

 

Despite liking my old Nikons The OM2n is a little gem. Compact, huge viewfinder and again very nice on the eyes. A very pretty camera in chrome. The reason I would keep the Oly over the Nikons comes down to this. The 28mm 3.5 lens. Good at all stops but for scenic work crank it down to F8-F11 and it is one of the best lenses on film I've ever used. IMO world class as is the fine construction of Olympus prime lenses.

 

Because of versatility and portability, in the end The OM2n with the 28 3,5 and a 50mm would be my choice if I could just keep one.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a fun survey. In my case it would probably come down to my 1957 Yashicamat or my Olympus OM2n.

In favor of the Yashica would be the 100% all metal construction and the overall beauty of the camera itself. It is an attention getter for sure. Not to mention the nice MF image quality.

 

Despite liking my old Nikons The OM2n is a little gem. Compact, huge viewfinder and again very nice on the eyes. A very pretty camera in chrome. The reason I would keep the Oly over the Nikons comes down to this. The 28mm 3.5 lens. Good at all stops but for scenic work crank it down to F8-F11 and it is one of the best lenses on film I've ever used. IMO world class as is the fine construction of Olympus prime lenses.

 

Because of versatility and portability, in the end The OM2n with the 28 3,5 and a 50mm would be my choice if I could just keep one.

 

 

I'm a bit late joining this discussion; that being said-

 

First choice: a Leica IIIF with a Canon(aka Serenar) 50mm f1.8 and any decent meter ( a Weston Ranger is really nice).

 

I've had this gear on hand/in hand since 1964. In a pinch a Leica IIIc will do - I rarely, if ever, use a flash. If you have problems with this set of gear, the problem isn't in the hardware.

 

Second choice: A Leica M3 with a Hexanon M 50mm/f2 (50mm Summicron V3 or Zeiss Planar 50mm/f2 also OK). This combination is easier to reload the film in dim light and after dark. Second choice only because the camera and lens are bulkier and heavier to carry all day.

 

Good light all-

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 5 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×
×
  • Create New...